On Thursday, July 12 2018, Mario Frasca wrote:
> I've not been able to satisfy all packaging requirements, and gave up.
>
> so I wish to close this issue, there is no candidate package any more.
You can send an e-mail to 898773-cl...@bugs.debian.org.
--
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00
I've not been able to satisfy all packaging requirements, and gave up.
so I wish to close this issue, there is no candidate package any more.
good day here again
I have:
- accepted all debian patches from 0.0.17-1 into upstream 0.0.18,
- removed the warnings that were in the `debuild` report,
- uploaded a new 0.0.18-1, it is now free from warnings,
further:
- I built a new bauble-1.0.56-1, resolving issue 755185,
- bauble-1.0.56-1 stil
> planning to update it to
> support Python 3.x in preparation for 2.7 reaching end of life?
btw, since my two adopted children `bauble` and `ghini` both depend on
`fibra`, and python is reaching end of life for them too, I'm afraid I
will port `fibra` to python3 anyway, that it is accepted into De
I don't see any inconvenience with this what you suggest.
I can import the library (with, if necessary, its history) into a new
github project.
I already patched upstream so it can be loaded in python3.
On 2018-05-15 14:20:15 -0500 (-0500), Mario Frasca wrote:
[...]
> it was developed between 2008-11 (0.0.6) and 2009-8 (0.0.17)
> [...]
The dates made me strongly suspect, but skimming the upstream source
confirms, this is very much not a Py3K-ready library. Are you
becoming de facto upstream for t
I did not notice the template
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fibra"
* Package name: fibra
Version : 0.0.17-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and
On 2018-05-15 14:20:15 -0500 (-0500), Mario Frasca wrote:
[...]
> it was developed between 2008-11 (0.0.6) and 2009-8 (0.0.17)
[...]
The dates made me strongly suspect, but skimming the upstream source
confirms, this is very much not a Py3K-ready library. Are you
becoming de facto upstream for thi
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I'm on my way to become the maintainer of a couple of packages for the
management of botanic collections, namely bauble and ghini.desktop.
both of them rely upon fibra, and fibra wasn't yet in Debian.
so I need fibra in two differe
9 matches
Mail list logo
