Bug#897165: transition: botan

2018-05-01 Thread GCS
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:41 PM László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 3:14 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: > > Control: tags -1 confirmed [...] > > Please go ahead. >Uploaded and already built on most architectures. You started the binNMUs and all dependent packages a

Bug#897165: transition: botan

2018-04-29 Thread GCS
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 3:14 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > On 29/04/18 12:43, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: > > A small, incremental transition of botan 2.4 -> 2.6 as the dependent > > packages are only biboumi and qtcreator. Both build fine with it. > > > > Two

Bug#897165: transition: botan

2018-04-29 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 29/04/18 12:43, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Dear Release Team, > > A small, incremental transition of botan 2.4 -> 2.6 as the dependent > p

Bug#897165: transition: botan

2018-04-29 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, A small, incremental transition of botan 2.4 -> 2.6 as the dependent packages are only biboumi and qtcreator. Both build fine with it. Two things to note. For sixteen