On 3/13/19 8:14 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> Since this library is ARM-specific anyway, wouldn't it make
>> more sense to have this build-dependency on ARM targets only?
>
> Please open a *new* bug for this.
Okay, can do. Although it seems that upstream is going to change
libopencsd now to use -fP
Control: notforwarded -1
On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 05:01 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Followup-For: Bug #895131
> User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: sparc64
>
> Hello!
>
> This change made src:linux BD-Uninstallable on sparc64 [1] as
> the package libop
Sorry, I did not see the full scope of this bug. Removing the forwarded tag.
John: Feel free to add the upstream bug if you report a new one for the
sparc64 issue.
Thanks!
> I guess we could do this. I just find it odd that a profiling library for
> ARM is a build dependency on all architectures.
>
> I'll look into fixing libopencsd.
The library seems to also include a decoder for (debug?) traces, which may be
useful on other archs as well.
Anyway, I reported the
On 3/13/19 5:14 PM, Gregor Riepl wrote:
>> Since this library is ARM-specific anyway, wouldn't it make
>> more sense to have this build-dependency on ARM targets only?
>
> libopencsd does build fine on other architectures, though.
>
> According to this[1], the fix should be simply replacing -fpic
> This change made src:linux BD-Uninstallable on sparc64 [1] as
> the package libopencsd doesn't build there [2].
>
> Since this library is ARM-specific anyway, wouldn't it make
> more sense to have this build-dependency on ARM targets only?
libopencsd does build fine on other architectures, thoug
Package: src:linux
Followup-For: Bug #895131
User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: sparc64
Hello!
This change made src:linux BD-Uninstallable on sparc64 [1] as
the package libopencsd doesn't build there [2].
Since this library is ARM-specific anyway, wouldn't it make
more sense to have t
7 matches
Mail list logo
