Hi Steve
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 02:10:52PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Considering debian/rules also hardcodes -O2 for the package itself, it
> doesn't seem inappropriate to also build the test shim with the same
> options?
> Yes, this is working around a toolchain issue. Feel free to reassig
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 08:47:41AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi Steve
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:37:17PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Ok, after some trial and error, I've determined that the reason my earlier
> > test succeeded was because I had built the test preload.so without the
> >
Hi Steve
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:37:17PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Ok, after some trial and error, I've determined that the reason my earlier
> test succeeded was because I had built the test preload.so without the
> benefit of dpkg-buildflags, which means -O3, which is used by default for
Package: thin-provisioning-tools
Version: 0.7.4-2
Followup-For: Bug #893557
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu bionic ubuntu-patch
Control: retitle -1 thin-provisioning-tools: FTBFS with -O3
Control: severity -1 minor
Control: tags -1 + patch
Ok, after some trial and erro
Control: tags -1 - patch
Control: severity -1 serious
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 02:19:40PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Package: thin-provisioning-tools
> Version: 0.7.4-2
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
> User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
> Usertags: origin-ubuntu bionic ubuntu-patch
> Hi
Package: thin-provisioning-tools
Version: 0.7.4-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu bionic ubuntu-patch
Hi Bastian,
In Ubuntu, thin-provisioning-tools 0.7.4-2 fails to build on ppc64el with an
ICE in the compiler while building the test su
6 matches
Mail list logo
