On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 04:04, Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> Go for it! Maintainer should probably be DPMT anyway.
To be fair, it is, but you're a human listed for the package so I
figured I'd reach out to avoid stepping on your toes. Thanks! :)
Will be uploading soon, and once/if ACCEPTed will fina
Go for it! Maintainer should probably be DPMT anyway.
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 01:31, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 16:59, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> > I've updated Git with what I think is finally successful packaging of
> > a newer Hy version (0.17.0 ATM). It requires updated "python-
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 16:59, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> I've updated Git with what I think is finally successful packaging of
> a newer Hy version (0.17.0 ATM). It requires updated "python-astor"
> (I tested 0.8.0) and "python-rply" (I tested 0.7.7), which I don't
> have time to chase down properly ri
I've updated Git with what I think is finally successful packaging of
a newer Hy version (0.17.0 ATM). It requires updated "python-astor"
(I tested 0.8.0) and "python-rply" (I tested 0.7.7), which I don't
have time to chase down properly right now.
"dh_auto_test" is passing but the autopkgtests a
4 matches
Mail list logo
