On 2018-07-31 21:40:25 [+0200], To Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 2018-07-28 10:11:47 [+0200], Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > We never break packages in testing (unless it's a critical situation, and
> > this
> > obviously isn't). Also the cruft package in unstable doesn't hurt much, so
>
On 2018-07-28 10:11:47 [+0200], Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> We never break packages in testing (unless it's a critical situation, and this
> obviously isn't). Also the cruft package in unstable doesn't hurt much, so it
> can be left around for a while longer. What we want to do here is to get r
On 25/07/18 22:01, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2018-07-25 10:47:50 [+0200], Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> Any suggestions from the D-Science folks?
>>
>> Maybe send this to the scilab bug rather than the curl transition one?
>
> I Cced the scilab folks. I was more interrested in the
On 2018-07-25 10:47:50 [+0200], Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > Any suggestions from the D-Science folks?
>
> Maybe send this to the scilab bug rather than the curl transition one?
I Cced the scilab folks. I was more interrested in the release team's
opinion if it is worth fixing those and get
On 21/07/18 23:51, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2018-07-19 00:39:27 [+0200], To Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> - scilab
>> rebuilt everywhere except for i386. Plus
>> #891351 [G| | ] [scilab] scilab segfaults at startup
>> #875790 [S|⛺+| ] [src:scilab] scilab: depends on openjdk
On 2018-07-19 00:39:27 [+0200], To Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> - scilab
> rebuilt everywhere except for i386. Plus
> #891351 [G| | ] [scilab] scilab segfaults at startup
> #875790 [S|⛺+| ] [src:scilab] scilab: depends on openjdk-8
> #884033 [S| |☣] [scilab] scilab segfaults building
On 2018-05-28 17:43:15 [+0200], Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Let's go with this. I'll schedule the binNMUs soon.
atm we have:
- netsurf (sid only)
#867694 [G| | ] [netsurf-fb] netsurf-fb: Completely unusable due to missing
dependencies, symlinks and documentation
#859230 [S| | ] [nets
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 28/05/18 15:59, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 01:09:14PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 - confirmed
>>
>> On 23/05/18 13:07, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 23/04/18 20:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 01/0
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 01:09:14PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - confirmed
>
> On 23/05/18 13:07, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 23/04/18 20:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >> On 01/03/18 22:31, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> >>> Package: release.debian.org
> >>>
Control: tags -1 - confirmed
On 23/05/18 13:07, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 23/04/18 20:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 01/03/18 22:31, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: trans
On 23/04/18 20:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 01/03/18 22:31, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'd like to request a transition for curl in order to unblock
On 18/05/18 09:24, Jan Niehusmann wrote:
> Hi Emilio,
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 08:38:30PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Hmm, I just realised libcurl3 ships libcurl.so.4, so that explains the
>> conflict.
>> I just found the rationale for this in
>> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/cur
Hi Emilio,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 08:38:30PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Hmm, I just realised libcurl3 ships libcurl.so.4, so that explains the
> conflict.
> I just found the rationale for this in
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/curl/merge_requests/2. That means this will
> have
>
On 01/03/18 22:31, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to request a transition for curl in order to unblock the migration
> to OpenSSL 1.1 (#871056). This is necess
On Fri, 2 Mar 2018 10:04:44 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> On 01/03/18 22:31, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'd like to request a transition for
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 10:04:44AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Also zurl seems to need Qt with openssl 1.1, which is only in experimental
> atm.
> That shouldn't be a blocker for this though (we can temporarily kick it from
> testing if necessary). But let's wait a bit and see.
I
On 01/03/18 22:31, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to request a transition for curl in order to unblock the migration
> to OpenSSL 1.1 (#871056).
Good!
> This
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 09:31:20PM +, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to request a transition for curl in order to unblock the migration
> to OpenSSL 1.1 (#
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I'd like to request a transition for curl in order to unblock the migration
to OpenSSL 1.1 (#871056). This is necessary due to the fact that the curl ABI
exposes a structure inher
19 matches
Mail list logo
