Hi,
Could this bug be fixed in Unstable, please?
Alternatively, if you would like, I am happy to prepare a NMU.
I don’t believe upstream will release another version (given the lack of
activity), so fixing outstanding bugs is ideal. In particular, the previous
maintainer bug (#889301) and swit
Hi Julien,
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:07:51 +0100 Julien Cristau
wrote:
> >
> I get that it's important to you. That doesn't make it an important
> bug.
This bug blocks improvement in other many packages. So while this bug
is for sure unimportant for libxft alone,
it has some importance for the D
Control: severity -1 wishlist
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 09:38:54 +, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> Control: severity -1 important
>
> I am raising this bug's severity to 'important', following advice from
> #887595.
>
> Also, the lack of multi-arch awareness in this package blocks multi-arch
> supp
Control: severity -1 important
I am raising this bug's severity to 'important', following advice from #887595.
Also, the lack of multi-arch awareness in this package blocks multi-arch
support in
libpango1.0-dev and libfontforge-dev. These packages, in turn, block multi-arch
support in Wine (i.
Package: libxft-dev
Version: 2.3.2-1+b2
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
The package libxft-dev is not currently multi-arch installable.
A comparison of the i386 and amd64 variants reveals no file conflicts.
Multi-arch support is needed for packages such as libfontforge-dev
and libpango1.0-d
5 matches
Mail list logo
