Bug#883199: transition: assimp

2017-12-01 Thread Debian/GNU
On 12/01/2017 12:53 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Go ahead then. i assume that means: "go ahead and upload to unstable". is this correct? gfmads IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#883199: transition: assimp

2017-12-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 01/12/17 12:48, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: > On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 19:35:31 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote:> >> Do those build fine against the new assimp? >> > > i just finished rebuilding all of them on barriere, and I couldn't spot > any problems.

Bug#883199: transition: assimp

2017-12-01 Thread Debian/GNU
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 19:35:31 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:> > Do those build fine against the new assimp? > i just finished rebuilding all of them on barriere, and I couldn't spot any problems. so to answer your question: yes gmasdr IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital s

Bug#883199: transition: assimp

2017-11-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 30/11/17 17:19, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi, > the new upstream of assimp bumps SONAME, so we need a transition. > > Direct reverse dependencies are: > - doomsday > - ki

Bug#883199: transition: assimp

2017-11-30 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, the new upstream of assimp bumps SONAME, so we need a transition. Direct reverse dependencies are: - doomsday - kido - mrpt - ros-geometric-shapes fmgdsar IOhannes Ben file: titl