Bug#882663: serverity important because qtwebkit is still in testing

2017-11-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 07:57:33PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Control: tags -1 important > > On 11/25/2017 07:53 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 12:59:54PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > >> Control: severity -1 important > >> > >> The serious severity is not ap

Bug#882663: serverity important because qtwebkit is still in testing

2017-11-25 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Control: tags -1 important On 11/25/2017 07:53 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 12:59:54PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> Control: severity -1 important >> >> The serious severity is not appropriate as long as qtwebkit is still in >> testing > > And how should qtwebkit get

Bug#882663: serverity important because qtwebkit is still in testing

2017-11-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: severity -1 serious On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 12:59:54PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Control: severity -1 important > > The serious severity is not appropriate as long as qtwebkit is still in > testing And how should qtwebkit get removed from testing without RC bugs on the rever

Bug#882663: serverity important because qtwebkit is still in testing

2017-11-25 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Control: severity -1 important The serious severity is not appropriate as long as qtwebkit is still in testing and no definitive removal date is known. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1