Control: forward -1 https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-28854
Am 14.08.20 um 09:47 schrieb Benoit Panizzon:
Hi,
>> Benoit, are you using IPv6? If yes,
>> https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-28854 could be the
>> culprit.
>
> Well, why should I use that old legacy phase
Hi Bernie
> Benoit, are you using IPv6? If yes,
> https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-28854 could be the
> culprit.
Well, why should I use that old legacy phased out ipv4 protocol? :-)
Thank you for the update!
-BenoƮt-
> 0x7fff8d3a11d0 in sprint_list_entry
> (entry=entry@entry=0x55d91ff8, line=line@entry=0x7fffabc902b0
> "[2001:4ca0:0:10a:215:65ff:feb7:4e7e]:11922", len=256) at
> res_pjsip_history.c:663
Benoit, are you using IPv6? If yes,
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-28854 could be th
Package: asterisk
Version: 1:16.2.1~dfsg-1+deb10u1
Followup-For: Bug #882145
Dear Maintainer,
Bug still present in Buster:
Asterisk 16.2.1~dfsg-1+deb10u1
[5016293.453591] asterisk[26466]: segfault at 7fb5 ip 7fb59afd5880
sp 7fb5998bebb0 error 4 in res_pjsip_history.so[7fb59afd4
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 04:59:30PM +0100, Benoit Panizzon wrote:
Hi,
> I could reproduce apparently two different segmentation faults by doing the
> following:
>
> pjsip set history on
> pjsip show history
>
> [8677620.301738] asterisk[24252]: segfault at 7fb6
Package: asterisk
Version: 1:13.14.1~dfsg-2+deb9u2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I could reproduce apparently two different segmentation faults by doing the
following:
pjsip set history on
pjsip show history
[8677620.301738] asterisk[24252]: segfault at 7fb6 ip 7fb5f434426a
sp
6 matches
Mail list logo