Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

Package: src:rustc Followup-For: Bug #881845 User: debian-m...@lists.debian.org Usertags: mips Hi! Attaching a cleaned-up patch for rustc_1.29. Could you include it in the next upload to fix rustc on mips*? Additionally, we will need to backport the LLVM atomics fixes for MIPS for llvm-toolchai

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

Hello! With the attached patch, I can almost fully build rustc 1.29 natively on mips, but it fails again with an out-of-memory error while generating the Rustbook: Rustbook (mips-unknown-linux-gnu) - unstable-book running: "/home/glaubitz/rustc/rustc-1.29.0+dfsg1/build/mips-unknown-linux-gnu/sta

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

Hi! On 10/19/18 10:56 AM, Dragan Mladjenovic wrote: > @YunQiang Su  Are you referring to failures shown > in [1] ? > > > If so, here is the overview :  > >>test [ui] ui/asm-out-assign-imm.rs >>test [ui] ui/target-feature-gate.rs >>test [ui] ui/target-feature-wrong.rs

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On 10/19/18 11:53 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> Needs SIGTRAP added to the list at [3]. >> >> (...) >> [3] >> https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/run-pass/invalid_const_pr

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

Hi Dragan! Thanks for the help! On 10/19/18 10:56 AM, Dragan Mladjenovic wrote: >>test [run-pass] run-pass/invalid_const_promotion.rs > > Needs SIGTRAP added to the list at [3]. > > (...) > [3] > h

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

...@debian.org; debian-m...@lists.debian.org; James Cowgill; Dragan Mladjenovic Subject: Re: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures add Dragan Mladjenovic, who is maintaining rust fo

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

add Dragan Mladjenovic, who is maintaining rust for mips. @Dragan can you help to debug rustc on mips64el, we have some test failures. I noticed that we allow more test failures on some arch. Can we also do it for mips64el for temporary? Aron Xu 于2018年10月3日周三 下午8:40写道： > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 5:54 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > On 10/3/18 10:35 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> Can you backport the llvm fix to llvm 7? > > > > Actually given 7 is not in testing and rust is not using it atm, what would > > be > > good is to have this backported to ll

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On 10/3/18 10:35 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Can you backport the llvm fix to llvm 7? > > Actually given 7 is not in testing and rust is not using it atm, what would be > good is to have this backported to llvm 6 asap, so that we can (hopefully) get > rust bootstrapped in mips*, which is

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On 02/10/2018 17:33, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 02/10/2018 17:26, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> Le 02/10/2018 à 16:55, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit : >>> On 10/2/18 4:53 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Can you open bug reports against llvm-toolchain-6.0 and llvm-toolchain-7 > to

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On 02/10/2018 17:26, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Le 02/10/2018 à 16:55, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit : >> On 10/2/18 4:53 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Can you open bug reports against llvm-toolchain-6.0 and llvm-toolchain-7 to make sure, the fix gets backported? >>> I would prefer that ru

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

Le 02/10/2018 à 16:55, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit : > On 10/2/18 4:53 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >>> Can you open bug reports against llvm-toolchain-6.0 and llvm-toolchain-7 to >>> make sure, the fix gets backported? >> I would prefer that rustc uses llvm 7 instead of 6. > > What is the cur

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

Le 02/10/2018 à 16:50, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit : > Hi YunQiang! > > On 10/2/18 4:48 PM, YunQiang Su wrote: >> this problem has been fixed on upstream. >> >> https://reviews.llvm.org/rL336328 >> >> llvm-6 seems still have this problem, while I guess llvm 7 should be OK now. > > Can you o

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On 10/2/18 4:53 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> Can you open bug reports against llvm-toolchain-6.0 and llvm-toolchain-7 to >> make sure, the fix gets backported? > I would prefer that rustc uses llvm 7 instead of 6. What is the current progress with this upstream? I have not followed up on this par

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

Hi YunQiang! On 10/2/18 4:48 PM, YunQiang Su wrote: > this problem has been fixed on upstream. > > https://reviews.llvm.org/rL336328 > > llvm-6 seems still have this problem, while I guess llvm 7 should be OK now. Can you open bug reports against llvm-toolchain-6.0 and llvm-toolchain-7 to make

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

this problem has been fixed on upstream. https://reviews.llvm.org/rL336328 llvm-6 seems still have this problem, while I guess llvm 7 should be OK now. YunQiang Su 于2018年9月27日周四 上午9:33写道： > > It is still about llvm+octeon problem. > > Maybe we can ask pin rustc on Loongson machines. > Ximin Luo

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32020 YunQiang Su 于2018年9月28日周五 上午11:05写道： > > Ximin Luo 于2018年9月27日周四 下午12:06写道： > > > > Ximin Luo: > > > Do you have a link to a more detailed description of the problem, so that > > > the rest of us can understand it? > > > > > > For example James in mess

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

Ximin Luo 于2018年9月27日周四 下午12:06写道： > > Ximin Luo: > > Do you have a link to a more detailed description of the problem, so that > > the rest of us can understand it? > > > > For example James in message 29 gave a very detailed summary of other > > previous problems: > > > > [29] https://bugs.deb

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

Ximin Luo: > Do you have a link to a more detailed description of the problem, so that the > rest of us can understand it? > > For example James in message 29 gave a very detailed summary of other > previous problems: > > [29] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881845#29 > > Nob

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

Do you have a link to a more detailed description of the problem, so that the rest of us can understand it? For example James in message 29 gave a very detailed summary of other previous problems: [29] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881845#29 Nobody in this thread has stated

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

It is still about llvm+octeon problem. Maybe we can ask pin rustc on Loongson machines. Ximin Luo 于2018年9月24日周一 上午2:21写道： > > Aron Xu: > > [..] > >> > >> Aron, the next version 1.27.1 is already in binary-NEW so the same issue > >> will block testing migration again, when that gets accepted. > >

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

Aron Xu: > [..] >> >> Aron, the next version 1.27.1 is already in binary-NEW so the same issue >> will block testing migration again, when that gets accepted. >> >> Earlier you said "Binary only upload from porter is allowed [..]" but I am >> not sure the other porters have access to a loongson-3

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

Index: rustc-1.27.1+dfsg1/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py === --- rustc-1.27.1+dfsg1.orig/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py +++ rustc-1.27.1+dfsg1/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py @@ -591,6 +591,8 @@ class RustBuild(object): (os.pathsep + e

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

2018-07-25 12:01 GMT+09:00 Ximin Luo : > If -mxgot is required for all rust programs then the rustc upstream compiler > should be patched to add this flag unconditionally, we shouldn't carry this > patch in Debian. The issue has been reported upstream as https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

YunQiang Su: > Ximin Luo 于2018年7月25日周三 上午7:15写道： >> >> Can you explain what this patch does and file it to Rust upstream first so I >> can see that they think it's OK? > > MIPS's default GOT size is small for performance, while for some big > app, they may complain GOT is too small. > So there i

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

Ximin Luo 于2018年7月25日周三 上午7:15写道： > > Can you explain what this patch does and file it to Rust upstream first so I > can see that they think it's OK? MIPS's default GOT size is small for performance, while for some big app, they may complain GOT is too small. So there is an complier time option

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

Can you explain what this patch does and file it to Rust upstream first so I can see that they think it's OK? The first hunk seems like it should be conditioned on the target-architecture being mips64, rather than blanket applied to all architetcures. I'm also unsure if it's better being applie

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

1.27.1+dfsg1-1~exp4 still FTBFS. As rustc seems need big got. --- a/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py +++ b/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ env["LIBRARY_PATH"] = os.path.join(self.bin_root(), "lib") + \ (os.pathsep + env["LIBRARY_PATH"]) \ if "LIBRARY_PAT

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

Blacklisting doesn’t fix the transition block. Once the package is outdated on any of the release architectures, transition is blocked. > On Jul 20, 2018, at 5:15 PM, YunQiang Su wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 18:10:14 +0200 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > wrote: >> On 07/17/2018 06:03 PM, Ximin

Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 18:10:14 +0200 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 07/17/2018 06:03 PM, Ximin Luo wrote: > > Aron, the next version 1.27.1 is already in binary-NEW so the same issue > > will block testing migration again, when that gets accepted. > > Well, I have to partially take my critic

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On 07/17/2018 06:03 PM, Ximin Luo wrote: > Aron, the next version 1.27.1 is already in binary-NEW so the same issue will > block testing migration again, when that gets accepted. Well, I have to partially take my criticism back. Aron has pointed out on IRC that rustc was not yet removed for mips6

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:04 AM Ximin Luo wrote: > > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: > > On 07/17/2018 04:51 PM, Aron Xu wrote: > >> I think you are too much defensive, while I don't mean offensive any how. > > > > Maybe you shouldn't automatically assume then that the other person > > doesn't know wh

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: > On 07/17/2018 04:51 PM, Aron Xu wrote: >> I think you are too much defensive, while I don't mean offensive any how. > > Maybe you shouldn't automatically assume then that the other person > doesn't know what they are talking about? > >> The thing to fix this forever i

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On 07/17/2018 04:51 PM, Aron Xu wrote: > I think you are too much defensive, while I don't mean offensive any how. Maybe you shouldn't automatically assume then that the other person doesn't know what they are talking about? > The thing to fix this forever is either of: > 1) Fix the software to m

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:48 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > On 07/17/2018 04:45 PM, Aron Xu wrote: > > Want to add that, on Debian Ports porters are allowed to include some > > trivial patches to make the package build/useful, while what I have > > done is a binary-only build without any

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On 07/17/2018 04:43 PM, Aron Xu wrote: > Binary only upload from porter is allowed but not encouraged, it works > similar to an initial upload with source+binary. Yes, I am fully aware how that works. I am a very active porter :). > As said this is temporary, blacklisting is needed and we are > j

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On 07/17/2018 04:45 PM, Aron Xu wrote: > Want to add that, on Debian Ports porters are allowed to include some > trivial patches to make the package build/useful, while what I have > done is a binary-only build without any source package change. Aron, with all due respect: 1) You assume I don't k

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:36 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > On 07/17/2018 02:29 PM, Aron Xu wrote: > > As a temporary solution to unblock, I've built the package on a > > loongson-3a box and uploaded. It is the same hardware as eberlin.d.o, > > which in turn suggests this could be relate

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:36 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > On 07/17/2018 02:29 PM, Aron Xu wrote: > > As a temporary solution to unblock, I've built the package on a > > loongson-3a box and uploaded. It is the same hardware as eberlin.d.o, > > which in turn suggests this could be relate

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On 07/17/2018 02:29 PM, Aron Xu wrote: > As a temporary solution to unblock, I've built the package on a > loongson-3a box and uploaded. It is the same hardware as eberlin.d.o, > which in turn suggests this could be related to Cavium hardware. Unless DSA is willing to blacklist the rustc package o

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:18 PM Ximin Luo wrote: > > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: > > [..] > > > > Ok. I wonder if there are other options for us here. > > As the main rust maintainer IMO it's best to just RM the mips binaries so > that testing migration works again. The LLVM bug on mips has been fix

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

> On Jul 15, 2018, at 4:53 PM, Ximin Luo wrote: > > Please RM it so other architectures get into Debian testing. We can try again > later when the patch lands in LLVM. No need to reject, the packages already got rejected. Also, if there is a patch for LLVM to backport, I can do that, I have

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: > [..] > > Ok. I wonder if there are other options for us here. As the main rust maintainer IMO it's best to just RM the mips binaries so that testing migration works again. The LLVM bug on mips has been fixed recently with an insanely large patch, so it will eventually

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On 07/15/2018 12:33 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Ok. I wonder if there are other options for us here. At what point does it run > out of memory? Do you have a log? I don't have a log, unfortunately, because I'm always building on eller or minkus where I cannot use sbuild but just run dpkg-b

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

Hi Adrian, On 28/05/18 10:33, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 05/28/2018 08:52 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Any progress on these issues? I see that rust built on mips64el but it now >> hangs. And mips/el are still uncompiled. > > I have not been able to build rustc natively on mips

Bug#881845: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On 05/28/2018 08:52 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Any progress on these issues? I see that rust built on mips64el but it now > hangs. And mips/el are still uncompiled. I have not been able to build rustc natively on mips/mipsel because the process always runs out of memory when I try on mink

Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On 02/02/18 13:14, James Cowgill wrote: > Hi, > > On 11/01/18 20:16, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 17/11/17 13:25, James Cowgill wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 15/11/17 17:30, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Source: rustc Version: 1.21.0+dfsg1-3 Severity: important Hi,

Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On 17/11/17 13:25, James Cowgill wrote: > Hi, > > On 15/11/17 17:30, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Source: rustc >> Version: 1.21.0+dfsg1-3 >> Severity: important >> >> Hi, >> >> Sometime ago I asked about rustc bootstrap status on mips*: >> >> 17:08 < infinity0> mips* fail many tests last time

Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 12:25:35 + James Cowgill wrote: > Hi, > > On 15/11/17 17:30, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > Source: rustc > > Version: 1.21.0+dfsg1-3 > > Severity: important > > > > Hi, > > > > Sometime ago I asked about rustc bootstrap status on mips*: > > > > 17:08 < infinity0> mi

Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

Hi, On 15/11/17 17:30, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Source: rustc > Version: 1.21.0+dfsg1-3 > Severity: important > > Hi, > > Sometime ago I asked about rustc bootstrap status on mips*: > > 17:08 < infinity0> mips* fail many tests last time i tried, ~3 months ago, i > didn't want to ship it

Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures

Source: rustc Version: 1.21.0+dfsg1-3 Severity: important Hi, Sometime ago I asked about rustc bootstrap status on mips*: 17:08 < infinity0> mips* fail many tests last time i tried, ~3 months ago, i didn't want to ship it, i haven't had time to check since >From >https://buildd.debian.org/sta