On Tuesday, 18 January 2022 01:17:38 CET Jonathan Rubenstein wrote:
> Maybe this is an indication that busybox-static needs to be audited, or
> that all 3 configurations should be audited to make sure something isn't
> missing that has no reason to be.
IIUC, that is planned:
https://bugs.debian.o
busybox-stable
Pardon me, I need to proofread.
I mean busybox-static.
Best Regards,
Jonathan Rubenstein
We will not enable telnetd in any of the flavours of busybox that we currently
package.
Respectfully, telnetd has been enabled for busybox-stable since 2010, so
you can install busybox-stable.
Maybe this is an indication that busybox-stable needs to be audited, or
that all 3 configuration
On 07/04/2018 13:47, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Dear Maintainers,
>
> Any chance this patch could be looked at?
> It would really help those of us in the networking world using Debian,
> and would make no difference for anybody else as there's no
> service/init script to start the daemon automaticall
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:16:26 + Luca Boccassi
wrote:
> Package: busybox
> Version: 1.27.2-1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear Maintainers,
>
> Please consider enabling telnetd in the busybox package. A tiny and
> trivial patch to set the config is attached inline. A rebuild with
tha
On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 14:30 -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 06:59:41PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > you are aware that this would only cause (these) people to switch
> > away
> > from Debian, but not from telnet?
>
> I honestly believe they just haven't tried. As long
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 06:59:41PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> you are aware that this would only cause (these) people to switch away
> from Debian, but not from telnet?
I honestly believe they just haven't tried. As long as you indulge them,
they will keep training new people with bad habits.
On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 13:35 -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 05:16:26PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Package: busybox
> > Version: 1.27.2-1
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > Dear Maintainers,
> >
> > Please consider enabling telnetd in the busybox package.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 01:35:14PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> Anything that makes it more work for you and hence gives more incentive
> for you to get the clueless people that want to keep using telnet to
> change is a good thing. Allowing telnet access ought to be made as
> difficult as pos
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 05:16:26PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Package: busybox
> Version: 1.27.2-1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear Maintainers,
>
> Please consider enabling telnetd in the busybox package. A tiny and
> trivial patch to set the config is attached inline. A rebuild wi
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 01:50:52PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 05:16:26PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> >
> > Please consider enabling telnetd in the busybox package.
> >
> > As much as I wish it wasn't the case, telnet is still widely used,
> > especially in the ISP/t
On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 13:50 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 05:16:26PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Package: busybox
> > Version: 1.27.2-1
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > Dear Maintainers,
> >
> > Please consider enabling telnetd in the busybox package. A
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 05:16:26PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Package: busybox
> Version: 1.27.2-1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear Maintainers,
>
> Please consider enabling telnetd in the busybox package. A tiny and
> trivial patch to set the config is attached inline. A rebuild wi
Package: busybox
Version: 1.27.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainers,
Please consider enabling telnetd in the busybox package. A tiny and
trivial patch to set the config is attached inline. A rebuild with that
change seems to work fine.
As much as I wish it wasn't the case, telnet
14 matches
Mail list logo
