On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> > Alas your patch doesn't seem to work properly here:
>
> [..]
>
> Gentle ping on this? :)
>
>
>
Sorry, I don't know how I missed your previous message. If you don't mind I
don't think we should add the py2 support. I'm fi
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Alas your patch doesn't seem to work properly here:
[..]
Gentle ping on this? :)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Hi Corey,
> Good point. I think we just need to get moving on our end. We currently
> only ship py2 for core openstack packages because upstream hasn't
> completely moved to py3
Happy to apply in that case; I was just checking it wasn't because "there
is no Python 2 package so we must make one...
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Corey,
>
>
Hi Chris,
> > In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
>
> Thanks for the patch. However, is Python 2 support explicitly required by
> a user or reverse-dependency?
>
>
Good point. I think we just need
Hi Corey,
> In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
Thanks for the patch. However, is Python 2 support explicitly required by
a user or reverse-dependency?
I would like to avoid introducing further Python 2 packages into the
world - just another we will have to remove
Package: python-daiquiri
Version: 1.3.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu bionic ubuntu-patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* d/control, d/rules, d/tests/*: Add python 2 support.
T
6 matches
Mail list logo
