Bug#880502: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#880502: lxc: cannot start container with kernel 4.13.10

2017-11-05 Thread intrigeri
Hi! Sorry for the delay, I didn't expect AppArmor to be enabled in the kernel a week ago (I thought I would coordinate this with Ben) and I was busy with the Reproducible Builds summit this week. Thanks Felix & Antonio for being on top of things. I'm glad the immediate RC issue was fixed. Felix

Bug#880502: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#880502: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#880502: lxc: cannot start container with kernel 4.13.10

2017-11-05 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Antonio Terceiro: > The workaround that works is using the setting in the container > configuration: > lxc.aa_profile = unconfined > with disables apparmor entirely. > I have just uploaded lxc 1:2.0.9-4 setting this for all containers. This > is not the greatest solution, but it's also not

Bug#880502: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#880502: lxc: cannot start container with kernel 4.13.10

2017-11-03 Thread Felix Geyer
Hi, On 02.11.2017 20:09, Evgeni Golov wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 07:09:10PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: >> seeing the AppArmor denials would be helpful to get this fixed ;-) > > I think the issue is different. > > Looking at the LXC log, we see the following: > lxc-start 2017110

Bug#880502: lxc: cannot start container with kernel 4.13.10

2017-11-02 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi, On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 07:09:10PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: > seeing the AppArmor denials would be helpful to get this fixed ;-) I think the issue is different. Looking at the LXC log, we see the following: lxc-start 20171102130036.516 ERRORlxc_apparmor - lsm/apparmor.c:apparmor_pr

Bug#880502: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#880502: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#880502: lxc: cannot start container with kernel 4.13.10

2017-11-02 Thread Christian Boltz
Hello, seeing the AppArmor denials would be helpful to get this fixed ;-) Please either grep -i apparmor /var/log/syslog or, if you have auditd installed, check /var/log/audit/audit.log For more details, see https://wiki.debian.org/AppArmor/Debug Regards, Christian Boltz -- > Anyway

Bug#880502: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#880502: lxc: cannot start container with kernel 4.13.10

2017-11-02 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Control: severity -1 important On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 11:04:10AM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 03:38:23PM +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote: > > Ohai, > > > > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 12:00:12PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > > lxc-start 20171101123914.655 ERROR

Bug#880502: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#880502: lxc: cannot start container with kernel 4.13.10

2017-11-02 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 03:38:23PM +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote: > Ohai, > > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 12:00:12PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > lxc-start 20171101123914.655 ERRORlxc_apparmor - > > > lsm/apparmor.c:apparmor_process_label_set:220 - If you really want to > > > start thi

Bug#880502: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#880502: lxc: cannot start container with kernel 4.13.10

2017-11-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 15:38 +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote: > Ohai, > > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 12:00:12PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > lxc-start 20171101123914.655 ERRORlxc_apparmor - > > > lsm/apparmor.c:apparmor_process_label_set:220 - If you really want to > > > start this conta

Bug#880502: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#880502: lxc: cannot start container with kernel 4.13.10

2017-11-01 Thread Evgeni Golov
Ohai, On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 12:00:12PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > lxc-start 20171101123914.655 ERRORlxc_apparmor - > > lsm/apparmor.c:apparmor_process_label_set:220 - If you really want to start > > this container, set > > lxc-start 20171101123914.655 ERRORlxc_appar

Bug#880502: lxc: cannot start container with kernel 4.13.10

2017-11-01 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Control: retitle -1 lxc: cannot start container with kernel 4.13.10 On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 11:32:31AM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Package: lxc > Version: 1:2.0.9-3 > Severity: serious > > I'm filing this in lxc initially as I don't know exactly where the issue > is yet. We will probably wan