Sorry for being allow to respond... Please do what you need to do
On February 13, 2019 5:47:41 PM EST, "Rebecca N. Palmer"
wrote:
>On 13/02/2019 09:10, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Any volunteer to backport the relevant changes I pushed to Git right
>now
>> to 0.8.0?
>
>I intend to try tomorrow, if t
On 13/02/2019 09:10, Andreas Tille wrote:
Any volunteer to backport the relevant changes I pushed to Git right now
to 0.8.0?
I intend to try tomorrow, if the uploaders don't say anything first.
I'm actually wondering why the package did not got any removal
from testing warning (or did I misse
Hi Rebecca,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 08:01:27AM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> Is the subject line a leftover, or are you actually proposing to move 0.9.0
> from experimental to unstable (which is not generally allowed in soft
> freeze)?
Yes, that's a leftover. I just uploaded to experimental.
Is the subject line a leftover, or are you actually proposing to move
0.9.0 from experimental to unstable (which is not generally allowed in
soft freeze)?
The upstream fix for #880245 (the original reason given for wanting the
new version) is supposedly
https://github.com/statsmodels/statsmo
Source: statsmodels
Version: 0.8.0-6
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20171030 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: En
5 matches
Mail list logo
