Hi,
was there a reason to left out {libqtxdg, libfm-qt,
lxqt-qtplugin}{hurd,kfreebsd-any}? This makes the whole DE unusable for the
users of these arches. Ok, hurd shouldn't be so many, but I run into it with
kfreebsd* yesterday.
Thanks Alf
On 31/10/17 01:53, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Followup-For: Bug #879787
>
> The binNMUs for experimental:
>
> nmu akonadi_4:17.08.0-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against
> qtbase-abi-5-9-2."
> nmu qtspeech-opensource-src_5.9.1-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild
> against qtbase-abi-5-9-
Followup-For: Bug #879787
The binNMUs for experimental:
nmu akonadi_4:17.08.0-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against
qtbase-abi-5-9-2."
nmu qtspeech-opensource-src_5.9.1-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against
qtbase-abi-5-9-2."
Andreas
On 28/10/17 03:15, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:36:31AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: forwarded -1
>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-9-2.html
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> I wish they didn't do that in micro releases...
>>
>
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:36:31AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-9-2.html
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> I wish they didn't do that in micro releases...
>
> I assume the rdeps are building fine? If so, go a
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:01:12AM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On donderdag 26 oktober 2017 00:40:44 CEST Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> > Qt 5.9.2 is a bugfix release in 5.9 LTS series, yet it has some minor
> > private ABI breaks so we have bumped the ABI virtual package names.
>
> Just did an 'ap
On donderdag 26 oktober 2017 00:40:44 CEST Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Qt 5.9.2 is a bugfix release in 5.9 LTS series, yet it has some minor
> private ABI breaks so we have bumped the ABI virtual package names.
Just did an 'aptitude safe-upgrade' on my sid machine and noticed the
following packages
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:36:31AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-9-2.html
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> I wish they didn't do that in micro releases...
>
> I assume the rdeps are building fine? If so, go a
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-9-2.html
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 25/10/17 23:40, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear release tea
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear release team,
We would like to request (yet another) transition for Qt packages.
Qt 5.9.2 is a bugfix release in 5.9 LTS series, yet it has some minor
private ABI breaks so we have
10 matches
Mail list logo
