On Tue, 2019-12-17 at 09:52 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> The "unlikely scenario" is reality NOW. Maybe you did not check but
> spyne is already gone in testing.
> That is what I wanted to draw your attention at.
Ahh OK. I didn't realise you considered it being dropped from testing
as important.
Am Di., 17. Dez. 2019 um 00:52 Uhr schrieb Russell Stuart
:
>
> On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 19:19 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> > Yes, I missed that. But maybe you have made up your mind now that
> > spyne got auto-removed from testing.
> > Isn't it better to have an alpha version in testing than no ve
On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 19:19 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Yes, I missed that. But maybe you have made up your mind now that
> spyne got auto-removed from testing.
> Isn't it better to have an alpha version in testing than no version
> at all?
As I said in my reply to the bug report, the "no vers
On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 13:25 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Hi Sandro,
>
> would you please reupload with the binary package? The package is
> still available on https://mentors.debian.net/package/spyne.
Perhaps you missed it as I only replied to the Debian bug, but I am not
OK with an alpha vers
4 matches
Mail list logo
