On 25.09.2017 23:10, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 at 22:00:51 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
I plan to rebuild a new 4.9.50 kernel with all kernel namespace features
enabled soon, and then I can give-back flatpak.
That has happened in the meantime.
All buildds (beside mx3210?) have fu
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 at 17:29:04 -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> In the recent successful builds on panama, it seems bwrap fails and the
> tests were skipped.
That's normal on official buildds and machines that resemble them,
unfortunately. Flatpak uses bubblewrap (bwrap) for lightweight containe
On 2017-09-25 3:20 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
Control: retitle 876743 flatpak: FTBFS on hppa: Creating new namespace failed:
Invalid argument
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 at 09:40:39 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Source: flatpak
Version: 0.9.12-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Justification: fails to
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 at 22:00:51 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> We have stability problems with latest debian kernels.
> That's why I've compiled a 4.9.50 (stable series) kernel and run it now
> on our buildds.
> Flatpack did built successfully in the past:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php
On 25.09.2017 21:20, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 at 09:40:39 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Source: flatpak
Version: 0.9.12-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
The flatpak build for hppa (admittedly not a
Control: retitle 876743 flatpak: FTBFS on hppa: Creating new namespace failed:
Invalid argument
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 at 09:40:39 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Source: flatpak
> Version: 0.9.12-2
> Severity: important
> Tags: upstream
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfu
6 matches
Mail list logo
