Bug#873706: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#874614: Bug#874614: Please demote some packages from dependency to recommendation

2017-09-09 Thread Michael Biebl
On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 14:46:06 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote: > > Sep 08 14:40:46 pluto systemd[1]: Starting Disk Manager... > > Sep 08 14:40:46 pluto udisksd[23330]: udisks daemon version 2.7.3 starting > > Sep 08 14:40:46 pluto udisksd[23330]: failed to load module crypto: > > libbd_crypto.so.2: cann

Bug#873706: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#874614: Bug#874614: Please demote some packages from dependency to recommendation

2017-09-08 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello! On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 02:46:06PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: [...] > Andreas, have you tested if e.g. lvm2 or btrfs support actually works in > the Debian udisks2 package? No. Regards, Andreas Henriksson

Bug#874614: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#874614: AW: Bug#874614: Bug#874614: Please demote some packages from dependency to recommendation

2017-09-08 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 08.09.2017 um 14:54 schrieb Bracksiek & Hemmelskamp: > Fine, in that case let's close this bug, #874614 is already closed -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#874614: AW: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#874614: Bug#874614: Please demote some packages from dependency to recommendation

2017-09-08 Thread Bracksiek & Hemmelskamp
Fine, in that case let's close this bug, it's annoying but udisks2 is the better places. Damn, i miss my own well configure mail client Cheers Alf

Bug#873706: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#874614: Bug#874614: Please demote some packages from dependency to recommendation

2017-09-08 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 08.09.2017 um 14:26 schrieb Bracksiek & Hemmelskamp: > Ok, in that case the modules in udisks2 has to be optional - and not > dependencies. What do you think? There is already https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873706 Further discussion should follow up there. Manually removing

Bug#874614: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#874614: Please demote some packages from dependency to recommendation

2017-09-08 Thread Bracksiek & Hemmelskamp
Ok, in that case the modules in udisks2 has to be optional - and not dependencies. What do you think?

Bug#874614: Please demote some packages from dependency to recommendation

2017-09-07 Thread Alf Gaida
Sorry,reportbug loose the patch diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index c2866a4..cd31bc0 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +libblockdev (2.12-2.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Demote some dependencies, please see #document-ch-relationships +

Bug#874614: Please demote some packages from dependency to recommendation

2017-09-07 Thread Alf Gaida
reportbug loose the patch. sorry diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index c2866a4..cd31bc0 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +libblockdev (2.12-2.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Demote some dependencies, please see #document-ch-relationships +

Bug#874614: Please demote some packages from dependency to recommendation

2017-09-07 Thread Alf Gaida
more fun on my laptop with no mdadm and gpt partitions: % sudo apt purge gdisk   Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree   Reading state information... Done The following packages will be REMOVED:   gdisk* gvfs* gvfs-daemons* gvfs-fuse* libblockdev-crypto2* libblockd

Bug#874614: Please demote some packages from dependency to recommendation

2017-09-07 Thread Alf Gaida
Package: libblockdev2 Version: 2.12-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, please demote the dependencies of mdadm, gdisk etc to recommendations. mdadm, gdisk and so on can be recommended, depend on them is much to hard. apt purge gdisk Reading package lists... Done Building dependenc