On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 12:11:20PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> this should be considered a duplicate of Bug#871765.
>
> the patch is rather incomplete in the compat wrapper part. but my own
> patch does not touch it at all, and i think i'll leave it at that
> (introducing new features to th
On 2017-08-12 12:11:20 [+0200], Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> this should be considered a duplicate of Bug#871765.
>
> the patch is rather incomplete in the compat wrapper part. but my own
> patch does not touch it at all, and i think i'll leave it at that
> (introducing new features to the compat w
this should be considered a duplicate of Bug#871765.
the patch is rather incomplete in the compat wrapper part. but my own
patch does not touch it at all, and i think i'll leave it at that
(introducing new features to the compat wrapper seems anti-thetical).
also, don't mix in the ssl2/3 removal
Package: isync
Version: 1.2.1-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: TLS1.0_1.1_removal
The package uses TLS1.0 by default. The patched should allow using
TLS1.0+ by default. Could someone please test this?
Sebastian
From: Sebastian Andrzej Sie
4 matches
Mail list logo