On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Antonio Russo
wrote:
> The two github repositories
>
> https://github.com/aerusso/pkg-zfsonlinux-zfs
> https://github.com/aerusso/pkg-zfsonlinux-spl
>
> have upstream branches representing an import of the zfs/spl
> sources, and a "proposed-updates" branch which in
The two github repositories
https://github.com/aerusso/pkg-zfsonlinux-zfs
https://github.com/aerusso/pkg-zfsonlinux-spl
have upstream branches representing an import of the zfs/spl
sources, and a "proposed-updates" branch which includes now
a changelog entry. It builds, installs, and runs on a fe
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 06:51:05AM -0400, Antonio Russo wrote:
> On 10/12/17 06:12, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> >
> > I would also suggest cherry-picking/backporting the following two
> > upstream PRs on top of 0.7.2:
> >
> > #6616: send/recv compatibility with 0.6.5.x [1]
> > #6695: receive_free
On 10/12/17 06:12, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
>
> I would also suggest cherry-picking/backporting the following two
> upstream PRs on top of 0.7.2:
>
> #6616: send/recv compatibility with 0.6.5.x [1]
> #6695: receive_freeobjects() skips freeing some objects [2]
>
> the first (DISCLAIMER: written
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 12:19:35AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> >
> > [Antonio Russo]
> >> How can I help out the packaging team on this? Who should I email?
> >
> > The best way to help is to continue contributing and participating
CC-ing bug/list again, IMHO this should be discussed publicly.
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 06:41:54PM -0400, Antonio Russo wrote:
> On 10/10/17 17:43, Antonio Russo wrote:
>
> > I'll check the FHS concerns, time-permitting.
>
> With Fabian's changes, the only things that maybe looked questionable
>
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 08:49:51 +0200 Dmitry Galenko wrote:
> I successful build deb packages from upstream repo, for kernel 4.10
> (custom) without any changes with this instruction:
>
> [snip]
this is not a good idea for production use IMHO - those converted packages
using alien lack all of the
> Aron Xu hat am 6. Oktober 2017 um 18:19 geschrieben:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> >
> > [Antonio Russo]
> >> How can I help out the packaging team on this? Who should I email?
> >
> > The best way to help is to continue contributing and participa
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> [Antonio Russo]
>> How can I help out the packaging team on this? Who should I email?
>
> The best way to help is to continue contributing and participating on
> the team mailing list and IRC channel.
>
> Aron Xu has been most act
[Antonio Russo]
> How can I help out the packaging team on this? Who should I email?
The best way to help is to continue contributing and participating on
the team mailing list and IRC channel.
Aron Xu has been most active with maintenance, and I hope he can comment
on how you best can contribut
I successful build deb packages from upstream repo, for kernel 4.10
(custom) without any changes with this instruction:
apt-get install -y build-essential autoconf libtool gawk alien
fakeroot linux-headers-$(uname -r) zlib1g-dev uuid-dev libattr1-dev
libblkid-dev libselinux-dev libudev-dev libdevm
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 08:10:16PM -0400, Antonio Russo wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I forked the Alioth repository, and got the debian packaging able
> to build 0.7.2 (the spl ./debian required no changes).
>
> The fork is available on github:
>
> https://github.com/aerusso/pkg-zfsonlinux-zfs/tree/proposed
Hi!
I forked the Alioth repository, and got the debian packaging able
to build 0.7.2 (the spl ./debian required no changes).
The fork is available on github:
https://github.com/aerusso/pkg-zfsonlinux-zfs/tree/proposed-changes/debian
I dropped a patch that seemed to diverge from upstream's suppo
13 matches
Mail list logo
