Bug#871469: transition: ocaml

2017-11-14 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Please also binNMU libaio-ocaml in experimental. Thanks Andreas

Bug#871469: transition: ocaml

2017-10-10 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On 09/10/2017 21:45, Ximin Luo wrote: That's alright. I see this is already started and binNMUs are needed. Is someone from the ocaml team handling these, or should I? I am handling these. Would it be possible to prioritize the rebuilds of lwt and ocaml-ctypes? They seem to be in the critical

Bug#871469: transition: ocaml

2017-10-09 Thread Ximin Luo
Simon McVittie: > Control: block 871469 by 877548 > > On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 at 10:05:02 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: >> On 23/09/2017 15:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> That's alright. I see this is already started and binNMUs are needed. Is >>> someone >>> from the ocaml team handling these

Bug#871469: transition: ocaml

2017-10-06 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: block 871469 by 877548 On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 at 10:05:02 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > On 23/09/2017 15:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > That's alright. I see this is already started and binNMUs are needed. Is > > someone > > from the ocaml team handling these, or should I? > > I a

Bug#871469: transition: ocaml

2017-09-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On 23/09/2017 15:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: That's alright. I see this is already started and binNMUs are needed. Is someone from the ocaml team handling these, or should I? I am handling these. Cheers, -- Stéphane

Bug#871469: transition: ocaml

2017-09-23 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 14/09/17 15:44, Ximin Luo wrote: > Stéphane Glondu: >> On 15/08/2017 22:16, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> Control: tags -1 confirmed >>> [...] ocaml 4.05.0 and a few selected packages have been uploaded to experimental and build fine on all architectures [3]. >>> So, basically

Bug#871469: transition: ocaml

2017-09-19 Thread Katsuhiko Nishimra
Hi. While Build-Depends-Arch is supported since Standards-Version 4.0.0, the transition seems to be running without build-depends-arch in the "Affected:" pattern. Is that OK? If it's OK, sorry for the noise. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#871469: transition: ocaml

2017-09-14 Thread Ximin Luo
Stéphane Glondu: > On 15/08/2017 22:16, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Control: tags -1 confirmed >> [...] >>> ocaml 4.05.0 and a few selected packages have been uploaded to >>> experimental and build fine on all architectures [3]. >> >>> So, basically, this transition is ready to be started from

Bug#871469: transition: ocaml

2017-08-16 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On 15/08/2017 22:16, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > [...] >> ocaml 4.05.0 and a few selected packages have been uploaded to >> experimental and build fine on all architectures [3]. > >> So, basically, this transition is ready to be started from my point of >> view. >>

Bug#871469: transition: ocaml

2017-08-15 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 08/08/17 10:32, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Dear release team, > > We would like to update ocaml from 4.02.3 to 4.05.0. This is 3 major > releases (

Bug#871469: transition: ocaml

2017-08-08 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear release team, We would like to update ocaml from 4.02.3 to 4.05.0. This is 3 major releases (and 2 years) ahead. With current unstable, on amd64: - 9 source uploads (at least) are