Le 23/07/2017 à 03:34, tony mancill a écrit :
> Thank you for the guidance - much appreciated! I'm working on the patch
> for maven-bundle-plugin 2.5.4 now, since it's just a simple signature
> change to add the MavenSession [1].
Thank you for the fix Tony!
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 08:48:36PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 22/07/2017 à 19:04, tony mancill a écrit :
>
> > Shall we go ahead and update maven-bundle-plugin to 3.3.0, or are there
> > advantages to patching the 2.5.x package to work with the newer
> > maven-archiver?
>
> Yes we should u
Le 22/07/2017 à 19:04, tony mancill a écrit :
> Shall we go ahead and update maven-bundle-plugin to 3.3.0, or are there
> advantages to patching the 2.5.x package to work with the newer
> maven-archiver?
Yes we should update maven-bundle-plugin but this one is tricky because
it's tied to bnd. I s
Control: block 869018 with 869361
Am 22.07.2017 um 19:04 schrieb tony mancill:
> Source: maven-bundle-plugin
> Severity: serious
> Justification: 4
>
> It looks like the update to maven-archiver [1] (for whatever reason,
> tracker.debian.org doesn't have a news entry for the upload yet) break
> m
Source: maven-bundle-plugin
Severity: serious
Justification: 4
It looks like the update to maven-archiver [1] (for whatever reason,
tracker.debian.org doesn't have a news entry for the upload yet) break
maven-bundle-plugin, which is the root cause of FTBFS #869279 [2] and
probably many others.
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
