On 2017-07-03 08:37:32, intrigeri wrote:
> Antoine Beaupré:
>> PS: seems to me like a good example why profiles-extra should be
>> deployed straight to /etc :p
>
> One step at a time: I'd rather see AppArmor enabled by default with
> a small, robust policy first. And then we can think of extending
Antoine Beaupré:
> PS: seems to me like a good example why profiles-extra should be
> deployed straight to /etc :p
One step at a time: I'd rather see AppArmor enabled by default with
a small, robust policy first. And then we can think of extending this
policy :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Control: tag -1 + unreproducible
Hi,
Antoine Beaupre:
> ERROR: Include file /etc/apparmor.d/program-chunks/postfix-common not found
> ... if apparmor-profiles is installed.
> This, obviously, is an error in the postfix* apparmor profiles which
> try to include a non-e
Package: apparmor
Version: 2.11.0-3
Severity: grave
Right now, in debian stretch, any apparmor command will yield:
$ sudo aa-disable usr.bin.irssi
ERROR: Include file /etc/apparmor.d/program-chunks/postfix-common not found
... if apparmor-profiles is installed.
This, obviously, is an error in
4 matches
Mail list logo
