Excerpts from Jonas Smedegaard's message of juli 1, 2017 10:46 pm:
Quoting Sandro Knauß (2017-07-01 21:34:47)
I am quite in favor of getting rid of code copies, but using on a
private library sounds like abuse which should be solved by either
rewriting/patching the project to only use public he
Quoting Sandro Knauß (2017-07-01 21:34:47)
>> I am quite in favor of getting rid of code copies, but using on a
>> private library sounds like abuse which should be solved by either
>> rewriting/patching the project to only use public headers, or
>> convince the libsrtp project to make those pri
Hey Jonas,
> I am quite in favor of getting rid of code copies, but using on a
> private library sounds like abuse which should be solved by either
> rewriting/patching the project to only use public headers, or convince
> the libsrtp project to make those private headers public.
Well qtwebengine
Hi Sandro,
Quoting Sandro Knauß (2017-07-01 19:33:47)
> I tried to get rid of the internal copy of libsrtp2 in qtwebengine.
> Unfortunably there is no srtp_priv.h,rtp.h and rtp_priv.h in
> /usr/include/srtp2 and I can't replace the copy, cause other parts
> depending on parts in the private hea
Package: libsrtp2-dev
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: normal
Control: affects -1 qtwebengine-opensource-src
Hey,
I tried to get rid of the internal copy of libsrtp2 in qtwebengine.
Unfortunably there is no srtp_priv.h,rtp.h and rtp_priv.h in /usr/include/srtp2
and I can't replace the copy, cause other
5 matches
Mail list logo
