Hi,
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 08:45:26AM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote:
> Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
>
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 01:11:47PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > None of these issues seem to have corresponding BTS bugs. If they did,
> > which severity would you choose? (hint: if they're
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 01:11:47PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> None of these issues seem to have corresponding BTS bugs. If they did,
> which severity would you choose? (hint: if they're not at least
> 'serious'...)
I would assign the following severities:
* V
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 10:10:57PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote:
> * Validate hostnames in 'acmetool want' [1]
> * Allow environment variables to be passed to challenge hooks [2]
> * Allow acmeapi to obtain new nonces if nonce pool is depleted [3]
> * Don't attempt f
Hi Niels,
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 05:51:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Any particular reason why you have waited until now with filing the
> unblock request?
I am writing my PhD thesis and had paused work on Debian. Your latest
message to debian-devel-announce made me realise it is high time
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Peter Colberg:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Dear Debian Release Team,
>
> [...]
Hi,
>
> Could you please unblock a new upstream bugfix release of acmetool, a
> client for the L
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear Debian Release Team,
Please accept my apology for the belated request:
unblock acmetool/0.0.59-1
Could you please unblock a new upstream bugfix release of acmetool, a
client for the
6 matches
Mail list logo
