On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 16 10:24:11 AM IST, Ben Finney wrote:
>On 14-Aug-2019, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>> Since there is no response for over 3 months for the merge request,
>I'm
>> planning to do an NMU.
>
>Ah, thank you for this notice.
>
>I am back involved in Debian packaging again. Can you instea
On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 16 10:24:11 AM IST, Ben Finney wrote:
>On 14-Aug-2019, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>> Since there is no response for over 3 months for the merge request,
>I'm
>> planning to do an NMU.
>
>Ah, thank you for this notice.
>
>I am back involved in Debian packaging again. Can you inste
On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 16 10:24:11 AM IST, Ben Finney wrote:
>On 14-Aug-2019, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>> Since there is no response for over 3 months for the merge request,
>I'm
>> planning to do an NMU.
>
>Ah, thank you for this notice.
>
>I am back involved in Debian packaging again. Can you instea
On 14-Aug-2019, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Since there is no response for over 3 months for the merge request, I'm
> planning to do an NMU.
I'm confused; this bug report (bug#863255) is closed as resolved.
What would you propose in an NMU? Can you please open a new bug report
instead?
--
\
On 16-Aug-2019, Ben Finney wrote:
> I am back involved in Debian packaging again. Can you instead make a
> merge request at the Salsa repository
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/pkg-jquery-at.js/>
> and show me what you're planning?
Is the change you're asking for represented in this merge reque
On 14-Aug-2019, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Since there is no response for over 3 months for the merge request, I'm
> planning to do an NMU.
Ah, thank you for this notice.
I am back involved in Debian packaging again. Can you instead make a
merge request at the Salsa repository
https://salsa.debian.
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 21:30:32 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> On Thu, 25 May 2017 09:30:05 +1000 Ben Finney
> wrote: > > […] Also consider providing node-at.js as I may need it for new
> > > version of gitlab (9.x) which depends on all node modules and uses
> > > webpack directly (instead of dependi
On Thu, 25 May 2017 09:30:05 +1000 Ben Finney
wrote: > > […] Also consider providing node-at.js as I may need it for new
> > version of gitlab (9.x) which depends on all node modules and uses
> > webpack directly (instead of depending on libjs packages).
>
> This is a separate request, so I'm ope
On 2017, മേയ് 25 5:23:30 AM IST, Ben Finney wrote:
>This library seems only useful in an interactive browser session. It
>seems quite misleading to declare that it provides a library for
>non-interactive Node.
>
>What would justify that declaration?
Its browser component is generated from its n
On 24-May-2017, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Also consider providing node-at.js as I may need it for new version
> of gitlab (9.x) which depends on all node modules and uses webpack
> directly (instead of depending on libjs packages).
This library seems only useful in an interactive browser session. It
Control: retitle -1 libjs-jquery-at.js: Please rename/provide libjs-jquery-atwho
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 libjs-jquery-at.js: consider providing node-at.js
On 24-May-2017, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> as it is providing jquery.atwho.js file.
Thanks for the
package: libjs-jquery-at.js
Version: 1.5.2+dfsg.1-1
Severity: minor
as it is providing jquery.atwho.js file. Also consider providing
node-at.js as I may need it for new version of gitlab (9.x) which
depends on all node modules and uses webpack directly (instead of
depending on libjs packages).
12 matches
Mail list logo
