Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote...
> It'd take a bit of thinking about how to handle mac address
> limitations, and the decision about whether to place the symlink or
> not, to bring this up to parity with the current implementation, but
> then this work could be donated directly to the vblade upstream,
On Wed, 17 May 2017 18:28:16 -0400 Daniel Kahn Gillmor <
d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> I'm both upstream and the debian maintainer for vblade-persist. I
> don't currently use it, and i don't have much time for it.
> Furthermore, it relies on runit because i
Control: retitle 862873 O: vblade-persist
Control: affects 862873 + vblade-persist
On Wed 2017-05-17 19:28:16 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> If someone wants to adopt vblade-persist, that would be fine with me.
> If someone wants to take the systemd approach i describe above, i'd be
> happy t
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm both upstream and the debian maintainer for vblade-persist. I
don't currently use it, and i don't have much time for it.
Furthermore, it relies on runit because i didn't trust sysvinit. with
the advent of systemd, i think that vblade-persist would be better
imp
4 matches
Mail list logo
