Hi Mattia,
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 10:57:04AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 10:45:33AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 09:27:47AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > I've prepared an NMU for libxml2 (versioned as 2.9.4+dfsg1-6.1) and
> > > upl
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 10:45:33AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 09:27:47AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > I've prepared an NMU for libxml2 (versioned as 2.9.4+dfsg1-6.1) and
> > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > should delay it longer.
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 09:27:47AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for libxml2 (versioned as 2.9.4+dfsg1-6.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
Usually I consider a bad idea incorporating patches like this that
have
Control: tags 862450 + patch
Control: tags 862450 + pending
Dear maintainer, hi Mattia
I've prepared an NMU for libxml2 (versioned as 2.9.4+dfsg1-6.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards,
Salvatore
diff -Nru libxml2-2.9.4+dfsg1/debian/ch
4 matches
Mail list logo