On 04/28/2017 11:03 AM, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:54:08AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> I'm not sure how come it worked before, and it doesn't now. I've fixed
>> the issue:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/460880
>>
>> Package upload and unblock are following. Thanks fo
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:54:08AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I'm not sure how come it worked before, and it doesn't now. I've fixed
> the issue:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/460880
>
> Package upload and unblock are following. Thanks for your bug report.
Great, thanks. Should I open a
On 04/27/2017 11:20 PM, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:45:09PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Probably. Though that's not helpful for me, the maintainer. *I* need to
>> reproduce the issue. Otherwise, you need to send a patch.
>
> The patch was attached in the initial report.
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:45:09PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Probably. Though that's not helpful for me, the maintainer. *I* need to
> reproduce the issue. Otherwise, you need to send a patch.
The patch was attached in the initial report. Can you send what this
command produces on your side?
On 04/26/2017 06:33 PM, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 05:32:22PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> I just tried, and there's no problem for me. It just works as one would
>> expect. I wonder why you have this issue. Could you investigate?
>
> The service seems to be running for a f
Another problem I see is that heat-api-cfn and ceilometer-api use
the same port (8000) so they can't both run on the same host but
at the same time openstack-proxy-node package depends on both of them.
>From the openstack ports list it seems that Telemetry (ceilometer)
is supposed to be on 8777:
I guess it's because now Ceilometer API works as WSGI script behind Web
server. And ceilometer-api script makes sense to use for developers.
On 04/26/2017 07:33 PM, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 05:32:22PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> I just tried, and there's no problem for m
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 05:32:22PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I just tried, and there's no problem for me. It just works as one would
> expect. I wonder why you have this issue. Could you investigate?
The service seems to be running for a few seconds after install but
than fails:
# systemctl
On 04/25/2017 09:22 PM, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> Package: ceilometer-api
> Version: 1:7.0.1-3
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> The ceilometer-api.service does not start properly after
> installation. The following error is reported in syslog:
>
> Apr 25 21:15:27 srv systemd[1]: Sta
Package: ceilometer-api
Version: 1:7.0.1-3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
The ceilometer-api.service does not start properly after
installation. The following error is reported in syslog:
Apr 25 21:15:27 srv systemd[1]: Starting OpenStack Ceilometer API...
Apr 25 21:15:27 srv systemd[1]:
10 matches
Mail list logo