I would be most grateful if you could drop the perl dependency for stretch.
From: Kurt Roeckx
Sent: 27 April 2017 19:32
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Cc: 860...@bugs.debian.org; Jonathon Delgado
Subject: Re: Bug#860254:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 09:25:33PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2017-04-27 21:32:42 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I'm not suggesting to add libwww-curl-perl.
>
> I'm not sure why we have things in /usr/lib/ssl/misc/, which
> doesn't sound like a useful place to put things.
>
> Note that there are actually manpages for them, so maybe we should
> move them t
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 09:25:33PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2017-04-27 18:18:50 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >
> > Yes, so perl-base should be find for c_rehash and CA.pl, but tsget
> > requires libwww-curl-perl and we already don't depend on it.
>
> So what is that you are s
On 2017-04-27 18:18:50 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> Yes, so perl-base should be find for c_rehash and CA.pl, but tsget
> requires libwww-curl-perl and we already don't depend on it.
So what is that you are saying? We keep perl as is and add
libwww-curl-perl (and if so is it RC and so testing m
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 02:00:47PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2017-04-23 20:31:35 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 09:12:39AM +, Jonathon Delgado wrote:
> > > So does this require anything from the perl package? I've never had
> > > trouble in the past
On 2017-04-23 20:31:35 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 09:12:39AM +, Jonathon Delgado wrote:
> > So does this require anything from the perl package? I've never had trouble
> > in the past using it with just perl-base installed. There could, of course,
> > be a perl requ
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 09:12:39AM +, Jonathon Delgado wrote:
> So does this require anything from the perl package? I've never had trouble
> in the past using it with just perl-base installed. There could, of course,
> be a perl requirement for a scenario where I haven't used it, but has any
: 23 April 2017 08:23
To: Jonathon Delgado; 860...@bugs.debian.org; Package Development List for
OpenSSL packages.
Subject: Re: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#860254: Bug#860254:
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 07:42:37AM +, Jonathon Delgado wrote:
> Every system comes with perl-base. The full perl
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 07:42:37AM +, Jonathon Delgado wrote:
> Every system comes with perl-base. The full perl package add a many megabytes
> of libraries which is a problem for space-constrained systems.
>
> Isn't the whole point of perl-base that packages won't have to depend on perl
> j
: 21 April 2017 20:05
To: Jonathon Delgado; 860...@bugs.debian.org; Package Development List for
OpenSSL packages.
Subject: Re: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#860254:
The openssl package ships perl scripts. Those scripts require perl which
means that this package depends on perl and this dependency is
aut
On 2017-04-20 09:35:27 [+], Jonathon Delgado wrote:
> Even if something in this script requires full perl, many ca-certificate
> users won't run it after the initial install (of ca-certificates), and apt
> won't let me uninstall just perl because of the hard dependency.
The openssl package s
Even if something in this script requires full perl, many ca-certificate users
won't run it after the initial install (of ca-certificates), and apt won't let
me uninstall just perl because of the hard dependency.
perl-base is essential, and seems adequate to run the scripts. perl shouldn't
be required.
I'm also suffering from the hefty perl dependency.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 09:45:59AM -0700, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> On 13 April 2017 at 09:44, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > One of the important binaries in c_rehash which is a perl script.
>
> Ahh, and that's used by ca-certificates? :(
Yes.
Kurt
On 13 April 2017 at 09:44, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> One of the important binaries in c_rehash which is a perl script.
Ahh, and that's used by ca-certificates? :(
♥,
- Tianon
4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 09:20:34AM -0700, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> Package: openssl
> Version: 1.1.0e-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Since 1.1.0c-3, the openssl package now Depends on perl, which is quite
> hefty, and if one does not need to use the included perl scripts, not
> necessary. Would it be ac
Package: openssl
Version: 1.1.0e-1
Severity: wishlist
Since 1.1.0c-3, the openssl package now Depends on perl, which is quite
hefty, and if one does not need to use the included perl scripts, not
necessary. Would it be acceptable to downgrade that Depends to
Recommends instead? That would ensure
17 matches
Mail list logo
