On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Olly Betts wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 07:56:30AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Anyhow, it should be a no-op patch and will be removed on the next release :)
Right, but it suggests a lack of pre-upload testing as the first upload wouldn't
have fixed the issues wi
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 07:56:30AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Anyhow, it should be a no-op patch and will be removed on the next release :)
Right, but it suggests a lack of pre-upload testing as the first upload wouldn't
have fixed the issues with poedit in experimental.
> (do you thin
Hello,
>You seem to have uploaded both wxwidgets3.0 and wxpython3.0, with the
>same patch to each (judging by the commit id).
>
>That is unlikely to be correct - wxpython3.0 sources contain a copy of
>wxwidgets sources, but this isn't used in the debian package so doesn't need
>patching.
yes, I m
You seem to have uploaded both wxwidgets3.0 and wxpython3.0, with the
same patch to each (judging by the commit id).
That is unlikely to be correct - wxpython3.0 sources contain a copy of
wxwidgets sources, but this isn't used in the debian package so doesn't need
patching.
Cheers,
Olly
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 04:42:14PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hello, poedit2 is having a lot of asserts and segfaulting (IIRC).
> Reason is a bug in wxpython3.0 and the fix from Poedit upstream has already
> been merged to wx upstream (3.0 maint branch too)
>
> Please cherry-pick the fo
control: retitle -1 wxpython3.0: asserts on valid poedit code due to bad mutex
unlock
This affects only poedit2, so just experimental for now
thanks
G.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Source: wxpython3.0
Version: 3.0.2.0+dfsg-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hello, poedit2 is having a lot of asserts and segfaulting (IIRC).
Reason is a bug in wxpython3.0 and the fix from Poedit upstream has already
been merged to wx upstream (3.0 maint branch too)
Please cherry-pick the follow
7 matches
Mail list logo
