Bug#859960: gcj-jdk: dh_javadoc: please add -notimestamp to invocation

2017-04-09 Thread Matthias Klose
Control: tags -1 + wontfix no, gcj is dead upstream, and will be removed for buster. On 09.04.2017 19:54, Chris West wrote: > Package: gcj-jdk > Version: 4:6.3.0-4 > User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: timestamps toolchain > Priority: wishlist > > By default, the javado

Bug#859960: gcj-jdk: dh_javadoc: please add -notimestamp to invocation

2017-04-09 Thread solo-debianbugs
The bug is not really in gcj, it's in a script in gcc-defaults, which ends up in the binary named gcj-jdk for some bizarre reason. However, I've just been looking further, and it looks like the script is literally only used by jaminid, and that jaminid looks pretty abandoned upstream, and has no d

Bug#859960: gcj-jdk: dh_javadoc: please add -notimestamp to invocation

2017-04-09 Thread Chris West
Package: gcj-jdk Version: 4:6.3.0-4 User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps toolchain Priority: wishlist By default, the javadoc(1) command adds timestamps to the generated HTML. This prevents any build package from being reproducible. This isn't useful in a Debian p