On 2018-01-11 14:32:59 [+0100], To Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On 2018-01-10 23:57:56 [+], Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> > Thoughts?
>
> If I understand Julien correctly in [0] he suggests a new soname (maybe
> with ssl suffix without bumping the 4 to 5) and a new package name.
>
> [0]
> https
On 2018-01-11 23:07:32 [+0200], Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 09:39:51PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> >...
> > since everything not
> > shipped Debian wise would be suddenly linked againt libssl-1.1 while it
> > might have been compiled against an earlier version.
>
> T
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 09:39:51PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>...
> since everything not
> shipped Debian wise would be suddenly linked againt libssl-1.1 while it
> might have been compiled against an earlier version.
The handling of non-packaged software is not perfect, but there's
On 2018-01-11 14:54:26 [+0100], Ondřej Surý wrote:
> I commented at salsa.d.o, but for consistency, I am resending my comment here:
…
> The conflict here means that all r-depends will have to migrate at once, and
> absolutely no backports would be possible. I wish there would be a way where
>
I commented at salsa.d.o, but for consistency, I am resending my comment here:
The conflict here means that all r-depends will have to migrate at once, and
absolutely no backports would be possible. I wish there would be a way where
libcurl3 and libcurl4 would be co-installable, but so far I ha
On 2018-01-10 23:57:56 [+], Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> > This whole transition looks pretty straightforward to me,
> > please let me know if there is anything where I could help.
>
> Following Adrian's comment, I prepated a patch that:
>
> * Renames *all* lincurl3* packages to libcurl4* (wi
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 11:16:29PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 05:44:55PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > just innocent bystander here with an observation:
> >
> > These two options:
> >
> > a)
> > > I do agree it's the correct solution though, and it would be a
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 05:44:55PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just innocent bystander here with an observation:
>
> These two options:
>
> a)
> > I do agree it's the correct solution though, and it would be a good
> > opportunity
> > to finally sync SONAME with upstream
>
> b)
> > Bec
Hi,
just innocent bystander here with an observation:
These two options:
a)
> I do agree it's the correct solution though, and it would be a good
> opportunity
> to finally sync SONAME with upstream
b)
> Because of 1 I think we should change the package name (and SONAME) for
> libcurl3. I don
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes ("Re: Bug#858398: curl: Please migrate to
openssl1.1 in Buster"):
> On 2017-10-12 23:44:24 [+0200], To 858...@bugs.debian.org wrote:
> > this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
> > remove libssl1.0-dev fr
On 2017-10-12 23:44:24 [+0200], To 858...@bugs.debian.org wrote:
Hi,
> this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
> remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
> of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
is there
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Package: curl
Version: 7.52.1-3
Severity: important
Tags: sid buster
Please migrate to libssl-dev in the Buster cycle. It switched to 1.0 due
to #850880, #844018 but should work with 1.1 as per #828127.
Sebastian
13 matches
Mail list logo
