Control: notfixed -1 1.13.1~ds1-2
Removing incorrectly fixed flag. The problem still exist in
/var/lib/docker/nuke-graph-directory.sh, according to the
email thread.
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
On 27 Jun 2017, at 9:47 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 07:21 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2017-06-27 08:11:03, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> If you want to be pointlessly pedantic about it then your bug is that
>>> your maintainer script in debian/ calls a program which sleeps,
Control: severity -1 serious
On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 07:21 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2017-06-27 08:11:03, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > If you want to be pointlessly pedantic about it then your bug is that
> > your maintainer script in debian/ calls a program which sleeps, whether
> > or not that
On 2017-06-27 08:11:03, Ian Campbell wrote:
> If you want to be pointlessly pedantic about it then your bug is that
> your maintainer script in debian/ calls a program which sleeps, whether
> or not that program is called "sleep" or not.
1. I don't want to be pointlessly pedantic.
2. It's not my
On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 19:07 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > If something used in the maintainer script breaks policy, the maintainer
> > breaks policy. With your argumentation, I could move a bunch of bad
> > commands to this_is_not_a_maintainer_script.sh, source that, and policy
> > does not mea
On 2017-06-27 00:10:02, Dominik George wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I stand corrected: the following command does call sleep.
>>
>> /var/lib/docker/nuke-graph-directory.sh /var/lib/docker
>>
>> I agree this is a bug, but I disagree it is critical, because,
>> technically, it's not the maintainer script that
Hi,
> I stand corrected: the following command does call sleep.
>
> /var/lib/docker/nuke-graph-directory.sh /var/lib/docker
>
> I agree this is a bug, but I disagree it is critical, because,
> technically, it's not the maintainer script that calls "sleep".
Erm… I somehow feel I missed some kind
Control: fixed -1 1.13.1~ds1-2
Control: severity -1 normal
On 2017-06-26 17:34:36, Antoine Beaupre wrote:
> Control: fixed -1 1.13.1~ds1-2
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 09:31:38PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
>> One of the maintainer scripts asks the user whether it is ok to “nuke”
>> docker contain
Control: fixed -1 1.13.1~ds1-2
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 09:31:38PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> One of the maintainer scripts asks the user whether it is ok to “nuke”
> docker containers using a message followed by a sleep.
Where? I don't see such a sleep here:
root@marcos:~# dpkg -l docker.io
Source: docker.io
Version: 1.11.2~ds1-6
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.9.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
One of the maintainer scripts asks the user whether it is ok to “nuke”
docker containers using a message followed by a sleep.
Please use a debconf-compatible inte
10 matches
Mail list logo
