Hi,
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:32:58 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
[...]
> True, but I gave in already for other packages where it might have made sense,
> but in this specific case it just doesn't.
Thanks for the note.
I will do a local repackage and see, if it resolves the
dependency problem I
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 09:11:39PM +0100, Elrond wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 17:45:18 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> [...]
> > Exactly my point since years. I don't see the need in multi-arch since
> > years.
> [...]
>
> Okay, I do still think, that we have some technical
> discrepancies
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 17:45:18 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
[...]
> Exactly my point since years. I don't see the need in multi-arch since
> years.
[...]
Okay, I do still think, that we have some technical
discrepancies in our thinkings, but from what I read here,
this can be summarized as:
You
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 05:05:40PM +0100, Elrond wrote:
> Okay, let's get this more real. My use case: Run amd64
> libreoffice on an i386 system. This is a very old install
> and I am trying to migrate it to amd64 step by step.
This can be done without multi-arch. And cross-grading while theoretic
Hi,
Okay, let's get this more real. My use case: Run amd64
libreoffice on an i386 system. This is a very old install
and I am trying to migrate it to amd64 step by step.
But the opposite could also be real: Having an amd64 system
and trying to run the i386 binaries. For example to test
them, with
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 21:15:03 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> notfound 852326 1:5.2.4-2~bpo8+1
> tag 852326 + wontfix
> thanks
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 04:47:50PM +0100, Elrond wrote:
> > Package: libreoffice-common
>
> This BTS is not for BPO bugs. *If* you file bugs here, file them w
notfound 852326 1:5.2.4-2~bpo8+1
tag 852326 + wontfix
thanks
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 04:47:50PM +0100, Elrond wrote:
> Package: libreoffice-common
This BTS is not for BPO bugs. *If* you file bugs here, file them with
a proper version. The BTS does NOT know about bpo versions and gets confused.
>
Package: libreoffice-common
Version: 1:5.2.4-2~bpo8+1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
It looks like libreoffice-common offers an architecture
independent interface to its users.
Would you mind setting it to Multi-Arch: foreign?
It's usually a matter of adding one line to debian/control.
This would hopefu
8 matches
Mail list logo
