Control: found -1 4.6.1-1
Control: tag -1 + pending
Hi,
Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> the file ./etc/xen-tools.conf of the source package, which will be
> installed at /etc/xen-tools.conf, contains a default value of 128M
> for the size of memory.
>
> This is no longer sufficient for current kernel
Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Axel Beckert wrote:
> >>Also, I conjecture that Thorsten's initramfs's may be much larger than
> >>Axel's.
> >
> >Ah, including initramfs. Ok, with the generic (and not hw-specific)
> >initramfs, 128 MB might indeed be too little.
>
> I
Thorsten Alteholz writes ("Bug#849867: xen-create-image: default config file
contains bad values"):
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I looked at the the installation manual and it says 112Mb for the
> > installler. That's unchanged from jessie and probab
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Axel Beckert wrote:
Also, I conjecture that Thorsten's initramfs's may be much larger than
Axel's.
Ah, including initramfs. Ok, with the generic (and not hw-specific)
initramfs, 128 MB might indeed be too little.
I created an image with just the default parameters and wa
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Ian Jackson wrote:
I looked at the the installation manual and it says 112Mb for the
installler. That's unchanged from jessie and probably hasn't been
updated for stretch. Thorsten, if that figure is wrong, you may want
to file a bug against the manual.
The code has a de
Axel Beckert writes ("Re: Bug#849867: xen-create-image: default config file
contains bad values"):
> Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I don't object to that lower value. There is certainly a strong
> > argument for being conservative at this stage of the Debian release.
>
Hi Ian,
Ian Jackson wrote:
> Axel Beckert writes ("Re: Bug#849867: xen-create-image: default config file
> contains bad values"):
> > Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> > > This is no longer sufficient for current kernels in Stretch and
> > > should be increased.
Axel Beckert writes ("Re: Bug#849867: xen-create-image: default config file
contains bad values"):
> Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> > This is no longer sufficient for current kernels in Stretch and
> > should be increased.
>
> WTF? I still have VMs (running Wheezy)
Hi,
Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> the file ./etc/xen-tools.conf of the source package, which will be
> installed at /etc/xen-tools.conf, contains a default value of 128M
> for the size of memory.
Sounds sane to me.
> This is no longer sufficient for current kernels in Stretch and
> should be increa
Control: tags -1 patch
Control: retitle -1 default config has too-low default memory size
Thorsten Alteholz writes ("Bug#849867: xen-create-image: default config file
contains bad values"):
> the file ./etc/xen-tools.conf of the source package, which will be
> installed at /et
Package: xen-tools
Version: 4.6.2
Severity: normal
Hi Axel,
the file ./etc/xen-tools.conf of the source package, which will be
installed at /etc/xen-tools.conf, contains a default value of 128M for
the size of memory.
This is no longer sufficient for current kernels in Stretch and should be
11 matches
Mail list logo
