On Saturday, 7 January 2017 11:43:09 AM AEDT Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> I'm using the refpolicy with this patch above it.
>
> kernel from unstable: Linux fornost 4.8.0-2-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.8.11-1
> (2016-12-02) x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> I tried to load the policy from the initramfs to be sure not
Le 07/01/17 à 07:21, Russell Coker a écrit :
On Friday, 6 January 2017 2:09:13 PM AEDT Laurent Bigonville wrote:
I just retested myself and it's working with the kernel from unstable
(apparently you need >= 4.2) and the following line:
genfscon sysfs /devices/system/cpu/online
gen_context(syste
On Friday, 6 January 2017 2:09:13 PM AEDT Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> I just retested myself and it's working with the kernel from unstable
> (apparently you need >= 4.2) and the following line:
>
> genfscon sysfs /devices/system/cpu/online
> gen_context(system_u:object_r:cpu_online_t,s0)
>
> So
On Friday, 6 January 2017 2:09:13 PM AEDT Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> I just retested myself and it's working with the kernel from unstable
> (apparently you need >= 4.2) and the following line:
>
> genfscon sysfs /devices/system/cpu/online
> gen_context(system_u:object_r:cpu_online_t,s0)
I must
On Fri, 06 Jan 2017 23:54:37 +1100 Russell Coker
wrote:
> This can't be fixed in policy. Policycoreutils should have an init
script or
> systemd tmpfiles config file to set it.
I just retested myself and it's working with the kernel from unstable
(apparently you need >= 4.2) and the followi
reassign 849637 policycoreutils
thanks
This can't be fixed in policy. Policycoreutils should have an init script or
systemd tmpfiles config file to set it.
https://github.com/cgzones/debian-package-refpolicy/commit/
3ba127468436334275398a824260383208ee58b1
Also the above patch is not likely to
6 matches
Mail list logo