Dear Free,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:56:59PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> Sorry, I probably wasn't clear. With "little fix" I meant the fix from this
> bug
> (dropping the build-dependency on gnupg1). So to be clear the flycheck source
> package version 30-2 now builds *unmodified* on Ubuntu/1
And for extra context, let me add that from this point on, any additional
package change that you'll push to the Alioth git repository will be
automatically pulled by Launchpad, and the backport will be rebuilt (with
an automatically generated changelog entry on top of the latest one). If
anything
Hi Sean,
On 22 December 2016 at 12:45, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Dear Free,
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:58:08AM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> > With this little fix the source package builds (and works) unmodified
> against
> > my current target environment for the backport (Ubuntu 16.04), so
>
Dear Free,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:58:08AM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> With this little fix the source package builds (and works) unmodified against
> my current target environment for the backport (Ubuntu 16.04), so there's no
> need to make a branch for now. I'll surely consider that shoul
On 22 December 2016 at 11:39, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:07:21AM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> > At the moment I just see revision 30-1 in there (that's the repository
> I'm
> > pulling from for the backport).
>
> Done!
>
Thanks!
> Please consider working on a branch and
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:07:21AM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> At the moment I just see revision 30-1 in there (that's the repository I'm
> pulling from for the backport).
Done!
Please consider working on a branch and pushing to that repo.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP sig
Hello Sean,
thanks for the prompt reply and fix!
Just to double check, are you going to push the 30-2 revision to the git
repository too?
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-emacsen/pkg/flycheck.git/
At the moment I just see revision 30-1 in there (that's the repository I'm
pulling from for the
control: tag -1 +pending
Dear Free,
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:57:02AM +, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> I noticed that the flycheck source package Build-Depends on gnupg1. Is
> there a reason for that? The package seems to build fine without it.
Previously needed for the test suite, but not anymor
Package: flycheck
Severity: minor
Hello,
I noticed that the flycheck source package Build-Depends on gnupg1. Is
there a reason for that? The package seems to build fine without it.
The reason I'm bringing this up is that depending on gnupg1 makes it
harder to backport flycheck to earlier Debian
9 matches
Mail list logo
