Bug#847567: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#847567: ttf-dejavu: Probably removal needed

2016-12-21 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Fabian Greffrath (2016-12-21): > Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > It would be great to check with debian-boot@ before handling such RM > > requests (removal of udeb-producing packages). We would have had a > > chance to switch to the “new” package. > > Oh, I am sorry for this. I hope the actual swi

Bug#847567: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#847567: ttf-dejavu: Probably removal needed

2016-12-21 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Cyril Brulebois wrote: > It would be great to check with debian-boot@ before handling such RM > requests (removal of udeb-producing packages). We would have had a > chance to switch to the “new” package. Oh, I am sorry for this. I hope the actual switch is as easy as I imagine (s/ttf/fonts/)?

Bug#847567: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#847567: ttf-dejavu: Probably removal needed

2016-12-21 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Fabian Greffrath (2016-12-14): > control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org > control: retitle -1 RM: ttf-dejavu -- ROM > > Am Freitag, den 09.12.2016, 15:52 +0100 schrieb Dr. Tobias Quathamer: > > thanks for the hint, done now. I've now seen that the new upstream > > is  > > already packaged as fo

Bug#847567: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#847567: ttf-dejavu: Probably removal needed

2016-12-14 Thread Fabian Greffrath
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org control: retitle -1 RM: ttf-dejavu -- ROM Am Freitag, den 09.12.2016, 15:52 +0100 schrieb Dr. Tobias Quathamer: > thanks for the hint, done now. I've now seen that the new upstream > is  > already packaged as font