Bug#847555: tracker.debian.org: Functional testing suite seems broken

2016-12-10 Thread efkin
Raphael Hertzog writes: > On Fri, 09 Dec 2016, efkin wrote: >> Raphael Hertzog writes: >> >> > On Fri, 09 Dec 2016, efkin wrote: >> >> I looked for the driver but it was not on stable/main so went for >> >> chromedriver. And the situation improved considireously. Then realized >> >> that improp

Bug#847555: tracker.debian.org: Functional testing suite seems broken

2016-12-09 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 09 Dec 2016, efkin wrote: > Raphael Hertzog writes: > > > On Fri, 09 Dec 2016, efkin wrote: > >> I looked for the driver but it was not on stable/main so went for > >> chromedriver. And the situation improved considireously. Then realized > >> that improper method was used for closing the

Bug#847555: tracker.debian.org: Functional testing suite seems broken

2016-12-09 Thread efkin
Raphael Hertzog writes: > On Fri, 09 Dec 2016, efkin wrote: >> I looked for the driver but it was not on stable/main so went for >> chromedriver. And the situation improved considireously. Then realized >> that improper method was used for closing the driver, leading to >> undesired spwaning of d

Bug#847555: tracker.debian.org: Functional testing suite seems broken

2016-12-09 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 09 Dec 2016, efkin wrote: > I looked for the driver but it was not on stable/main so went for > chromedriver. And the situation improved considireously. Then realized > that improper method was used for closing the driver, leading to > undesired spwaning of driver processes. Thanks, I appl

Bug#847555: tracker.debian.org: Functional testing suite seems broken

2016-12-09 Thread efkin
Package: tracker.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, I wanted to work on some fixes for tracker.d.o. so i setup a stable kvm for better isolation but the functional test suite seemed broken. Also the docs were missing the reference to the driver. I looked for the driver but