Bug#846311: dput: please use python-gpg instead of python-gpgme

2016-12-20 Thread Ben Finney
On 01-Dec-2016, Ben Finney wrote: > The ‘python-gpg’ package doesn't seem to be in Debian Stretch yet, so > I'll need to wait before assessing this. I have uploaded ‘dput’ version “0.11.1” to the ‘experimental’ suite. This incorporates the changes DKG proposed on this bug report. Please try some

Bug#846311: dput: please use python-gpg instead of python-gpgme

2016-12-05 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2016-11-30 15:00:37 -0500, Ben Finney wrote: > I agree, though I took the ‘pyme’ name as a pretty poor sign of fit > with the Python ecosystem. When I looked at that library the interface > was terribly low-level – a thin wrapper around the C-style library – > and the ‘gpgme’ library was a m

Bug#846311: dput: please use python-gpg instead of python-gpgme

2016-11-30 Thread Ben Finney
On 30-Nov-2016, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Thanks for resolving #835598 by switching to a python wrapper of > gpgme. Alas, the ecosystem for using gpg from python is a cluttered > one and it's easy to settle on a problematic choice. Thanks for wading into the clutter :-) > The "gpg" python mod

Bug#846311: dput: please use python-gpg instead of python-gpgme

2016-11-29 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: dput Version: 0.11.0 Severity: normal Tags: patch Thanks for resolving #835598 by switching to a python wrapper of gpgme. Alas, the ecosystem for using gpg from python is a cluttered one and it's easy to settle on a problematic choice. The "gpg" python module is maintained by the upstre