Bug#846184: binutils-mingw-w64: Inconsistent with other cross packages

2016-11-29 Thread Ben Longbons
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Stephen Kitt wrote: > I wasn't aware of that, I thought all modern tools were capable of using > triplet-prefixed tools. I'll add the symlinks... Just out of curiosity, do > you have specific examples of non-C cross-compilers which fail currently? I'm currently w

Bug#846184: binutils-mingw-w64: Inconsistent with other cross packages

2016-11-29 Thread Stephen Kitt
Control: clone -1 -2 Control: retitle -2 binutils-mingw-w64: Please provide /usr/$triple/bin symlinks Hi Ben, On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 19:48:15 -0800, Ben Longbons wrote: > To be consistent with other binutils-$cross packages: > > * the packages should be named according to the triple > (binutils-i6

Bug#846184: binutils-mingw-w64: Inconsistent with other cross packages

2016-11-28 Thread Ben Longbons
Package: binutils-mingw-w64 Version: 2.27.51.20161105-2+7.2 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, To be consistent with other binutils-$cross packages: * the packages should be named according to the triple (binutils-i686-w64-mingw32 and binutils-x86-64-w64-mingw32 - note that underscore is not va