On 29/01/17 at 15:45 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 at 15:50:38 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 29/01/17 at 11:06 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > If my understanding of TSX (as discussed with the Cambridge BSP) is
> > > correct, this is not release-critical for stretch [.
On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 at 15:50:38 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 29/01/17 at 11:06 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > If my understanding of TSX (as discussed with the Cambridge BSP) is
> > correct, this is not release-critical for stretch [...]
> > so I'm tagging it buster,sid with release team app
Hi,
On 29/01/17 at 11:06 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: tags 844146 + buster
> Control: tags 844146 - stretch
>
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 at 21:08:02 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > This failure happens on a CPU with TSX extensions available, but is not
> > reproducible on a machine without
Control: tags 844146 + buster
Control: tags 844146 - stretch
On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 at 21:08:02 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> This failure happens on a CPU with TSX extensions available, but is not
> reproducible on a machine without them.
If my understanding of TSX (as discussed with the Cambridge
Source: libmicrohttpd
Version: 0.9.51-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2016 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[6]
5 matches
Mail list logo