Hi,
Vagrant Cascadian (2016-11-13):
> Apologies; I had been intending to commit the removal myself after the
> openrd testers got back to me, but testing took much longer than
> expected, and I neglected to follow-up with the removals needed for d-i.
>
> I'll make sure with future removals to CC
On 2016-11-10, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Steve noted that the armel build fails on the cdimage side because
> kirkwood/u-boot stuff is missing for openrd. This isn't entirely
> surprising because the latest u-boot upload to unstable, which got
> used to build debian-installer 20161031 had:
> | u-boo
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Cyril Brulebois (2016-11-10):
> That being said, there's still the issue of debian-installer's build
> system not detecting this issue, which is what this bug report is
> about.
Looking at while loops under build/, only a few arm* bits seemed
affected. Should be fix
Hi,
Martin Michlmayr (2016-11-10):
> * Cyril Brulebois [2016-11-10 18:27]:
> > Once a fix is implemented for this specific issue, it would be nice to
> > know what to do with the kirkwood/u-boot things for openrd. If they're
> > not going to work (again/at all), the relevant code should go away
* Cyril Brulebois [2016-11-10 18:27]:
> Once a fix is implemented for this specific issue, it would be nice to
> know what to do with the kirkwood/u-boot things for openrd. If they're
> not going to work (again/at all), the relevant code should go away
> from debian-installer.git; or am I missing
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20161031
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS(ish)
(X-D-Cc: u-boot Maintainer & Uploaders; please keep them in the loop
when replying; also debian-arm@ for good measure.)
Hi,
Steve noted that the armel build fails on the cdimage side because
kirkwood/u-boot s
6 matches
Mail list logo