On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 04:58:52PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Fair enough. I'm wondering if the enclosed patch would accomplish the
> same thing. I mean, the goal always is to set CC for the target host,
> right?
>From a cross builder's perspective, yes. From a clang user's
perspective,
2016-11-16 16:40 GMT+02:00 Helmut Grohne :
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:59:50PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> I cannot help but wonder if setting CC for cross-build would be best
>> handled by the build tools themselves, rather than compensated for by
>> individual packages' debian/rules.
>
>
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:59:50PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> I cannot help but wonder if setting CC for cross-build would be best
> handled by the build tools themselves, rather than compensated for by
> individual packages' debian/rules.
I'm inclined to agree, but you don't have a build
2016-11-10 18:10 GMT+02:00 Helmut Grohne :
> Source: cups-pdf
> Version: 2.6.1-21
> Tags: patch
> User: helm...@debian.org
> Usertags: rebootstrap
>
> cups-pdf fails to cross build from source, because it uses the build
> architecture compiler. Defaulting CC to a triplet-prefixed compiler
> fixes t
Source: cups-pdf
Version: 2.6.1-21
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
cups-pdf fails to cross build from source, because it uses the build
architecture compiler. Defaulting CC to a triplet-prefixed compiler
fixes the build. Please consider applying the attached patch.
Helm
5 matches
Mail list logo