Santiago Vila writes ("Re: Bug#842452: FTBFS depdnding on docs/apibuild.py
timestamp (api docs not buildable)"):
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 09:24:35PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > The reason I think it's RC is that it demonstrates that the
> > documentation files
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 09:24:35PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> The reason I think it's RC is that it demonstrates that the
> documentation files shipped in the package are not buildable from
> source (at least, using tools in the current version of Debian
> unstable main).
IMO, it does not demons
Santiago Vila writes ("Re: Bug#842452: FTBFS depdnding on docs/apibuild.py
timestamp (api docs not buildable)"):
> I disagree that this is RC, because no sane autobuilder would ever do that.
The reason I think it's RC is not because I think it's essential that
this ti
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 12:21:39PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Package: libvirt
> Version: 2.3.0-3
> Severity: serious
>
> [...]
>
> $ apt-get source libvirt
> $ cd libvirt-2.3.0/
> $ touch docs/apibuild.py
> $ dpkg-buildpackage -uc -b >../log 2>&1
>
> [...]
I disagree that this is RC, be
Package: libvirt
Version: 2.3.0-3
Severity: serious
I have discovered that libvirt sometimes doesn't build, depending on
the file timestamps. Specifically: the api docs don't build; but,
whether they are rebuilt depends on timestamps and a simple "apt-get
source" generates timestamps which do not
5 matches
Mail list logo