On 05/12/16 23:42, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Gilles Filippini a écrit le 04/12/2016 à 12:36 :
>> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 03/12/2016 à 12:26 :
>>> On 01/12/16 19:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 01/12/16 19:32, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Gilles Filippini a écrit le 28/11/2016 à
Gilles Filippini a écrit le 04/12/2016 à 12:36 :
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 03/12/2016 à 12:26 :
>> On 01/12/16 19:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 01/12/16 19:32, Gilles Filippini wrote:
Gilles Filippini a écrit le 28/11/2016 à 10:05 :
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 03/12/2016 à 12:26 :
> On 01/12/16 19:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 01/12/16 19:32, Gilles Filippini wrote:
>>> Gilles Filippini a écrit le 28/11/2016 à 10:05 :
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 27/11/2016 à 23:52 :
> On 27/11/16 23:21, Gilles Fi
On 01/12/16 19:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 01/12/16 19:32, Gilles Filippini wrote:
>> Gilles Filippini a écrit le 28/11/2016 à 10:05 :
>>> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 27/11/2016 à 23:52 :
On 27/11/16 23:21, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a
On 01/12/16 19:32, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Gilles Filippini a écrit le 28/11/2016 à 10:05 :
>> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 27/11/2016 à 23:52 :
>>> On 27/11/16 23:21, Gilles Filippini wrote:
Hi,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 06/11/2016 à 16:20 :
>>> Yes, this is looki
Gilles Filippini a écrit le 28/11/2016 à 10:05 :
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 27/11/2016 à 23:52 :
>> On 27/11/16 23:21, Gilles Filippini wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 06/11/2016 à 16:20 :
>> Yes, this is looking very good, so I'm acking it. But please don't
>
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 27/11/2016 à 23:52 :
> On 27/11/16 23:21, Gilles Filippini wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 06/11/2016 à 16:20 :
> Yes, this is looking very good, so I'm acking it. But please don't upload
> just
> yet, I'll give you the go in a fe
On 27/11/16 23:21, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 06/11/2016 à 16:20 :
Yes, this is looking very good, so I'm acking it. But please don't upload
just
yet, I'll give you the go in a few days when things are a bit calmer
(there are
just
Hi,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 06/11/2016 à 16:20 :
>>> Yes, this is looking very good, so I'm acking it. But please don't upload
>>> just
>>> yet, I'll give you the go in a few days when things are a bit calmer (there
>>> are
>>> just too many transitions at the moment).
Any news on thi
On 05/11/16 21:37, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 843040 842815
>
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 05/11/2016 à 17:29 :
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 04/11/16 14:45, Gilles Filippini wrote:
>>> Gilles Filippini a écrit le 02/11/2016 à 19:05 :
Hi,
Good new
Control: block -1 by 843040 842815
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 05/11/2016 à 17:29 :
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 04/11/16 14:45, Gilles Filippini wrote:
>> Gilles Filippini a écrit le 02/11/2016 à 19:05 :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Good news: every hdf5 reverse dependency but 8 is now 'binnmu O
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 04/11/16 14:45, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Gilles Filippini a écrit le 02/11/2016 à 19:05 :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Good news: every hdf5 reverse dependency but 8 is now 'binnmu OK'. The
>> remainder is:
>> * shogun FTBFS unrelated to hdf5 - not in testing - #809290
Gilles Filippini a écrit le 02/11/2016 à 19:05 :
> Hi,
>
> Good news: every hdf5 reverse dependency but 8 is now 'binnmu OK'. The
> remainder is:
> * shogun FTBFS unrelated to hdf5 - not in testing - #809290
> * tessa FTBFS unrelated to hdf5 - not in testing - #817690
>
Hi,
Good news: every hdf5 reverse dependency but 8 is now 'binnmu OK'. The
remainder is:
* shogun FTBFS unrelated to hdf5 - not in testing - #809290
* tessa FTBFS unrelated to hdf5 - not in testing - #817690
* aster FTBFS unrelated to hdf5 - not in testing
On 2016-10-28 14:12, Gilles Filippini wrote:
Status update:
insighttoolkit4: hdf5 libmincpatch provided via #842342
And:
ants: hdf5 insighttoolkit4OK
There is only pytables remaining on the way now
Thanks,
_g.
On 2016-10-26 19:12, Gilles Filippini wrote:
On 2016-10-26 19:03, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 10/26/2016 06:46 PM, Gilles Filippini wrote:
I've checked the build of every reverse dependencies. These few ones
are of concern:
* libsis-jhdf5-java : unmaintained upstream - low popcon
* pytable
On 2016-10-26 19:03, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 10/26/2016 06:46 PM, Gilles Filippini wrote:
I've checked the build of every reverse dependencies. These few ones
are of concern:
* libsis-jhdf5-java : unmaintained upstream - low popcon
* pytables : doesn't support new hdf5 API - popcon abou
On 10/26/2016 06:46 PM, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> I've checked the build of every reverse dependencies. These few ones are of
> concern:
> * libsis-jhdf5-java : unmaintained upstream - low popcon
> * pytables : doesn't support new hdf5 API - popcon about 3000 - no reverse
> dependencies
> * yoric
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Release Team,
I hereby request a transition slot for hdf5 1.10 currently in experimental.
This release ships major changes and has it
19 matches
Mail list logo