On Sat, 2016-10-22 at 13:12 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> Removing grass from the problematic architectures where actual users of
> grass are unlikely since almost everyone is using amd64 is the road of
> least resistance to not block testing migration of grass. Which britney
> unhelpfully
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 10/22/2016 12:56 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 22:05:01 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: britney
>>
>> grass (7.0.5-2) is not migrating t
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 22:05:01 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: britney
>
> grass (7.0.5-2) is not migrating to testing even though it's a valid
> candidate.
>
> Du
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
grass (7.0.5-2) is not migrating to testing even though it's a valid
candidate.
Due to the motif issue (#840394) the grass package and its reverse
dependencies (libgdal-grass & qgis) have b
4 matches
Mail list logo