So, does someone want to propose a resolution so we can move this
forward?
> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes:
Ian> I know that you do not _set out_ reinforce Ron's position of
Ian> power over his victims. That is not your goal. You are trying
Ian> to come to an amicable settlement. You are trying to get
Ian> everyone to be nice.
Ian> But when peo
Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Bug#841294: Global Ballot Thoughts"):
> I am not prepared to override those seeking global6 either.
I don't know quite how to put this. I'm afraid that what I say is
going to sound quite aggressive and hurtful. But I think it is a very
important
>>>>> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes:
Ian> Sam Hartman writes ("Bug#841294: Global Ballot Thoughts"):
>> Like you I want to see global6 for stretch. I'm not sure I want
>> to see it bad enough to override someone. I'd rank do
Sam Hartman writes ("Bug#841294: Global Ballot Thoughts"):
> Like you I want to see global6 for stretch.
> I'm not sure I want to see it bad enough to override someone.
> I'd rank doing so above FD though but below a pure advice option.
Why are you prepared to over
Like you I want to see global6 for stretch.
I'm not sure I want to see it bad enough to override someone.
I'd rank doing so above FD though but below a pure advice option.
Le mercredi, 30 novembre 2016, 14.11:43 h CET Sam Hartman a écrit :
> I'd really like to see the TC offer at least the following advice:
>
> 1) We believe that strong evidence is required to hold back integrating
> new versions of software like global. The burden of proof is on those
> who propos
I'd really like to see the TC offer at least the following advice:
1) We believe that strong evidence is required to hold back integrating
new versions of software like global. The burden of proof is on those
who propose not to update, not on those who would like Debian to contain
current upstr
8 matches
Mail list logo
